Cognizant found guilty of discriminating against non-Indian employees
1–10 of 478 posts
Re: Cognizant found guilty of discriminating against non-Indian employees
#2Re: Cognizant found guilty of discriminating against non-Indian employees
#3Previously saw it at a lesser degree to older unicorns and places like Oracle, IBM, etc.
Although it’s normalised in the latter ones.
Re: Cognizant found guilty of discriminating against non-Indian employees
#4At the risk of sounding racist (though I'm Indian, so I guess I get some leeway here), there are likely more biases at play than it seems.
You’ll see South or North Indians from a particular state prefer hiring employees from the same state, who speak the same language, and who look like them. And it doesn’t stop there. Caste discrimination plays a role too, and it even has its own Wiki page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caste_discrimination_in_the_Un.... See also:
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dalit
[2] https://harpercollinsin.medium.com/how-does-anyone-know-what...
This kind of thing is so rampant in India that you hear about it all the time on Reddit.
So yeah, Cognizant has been found guilty against non-Indians but they probably do this to other Indians.
Re: Cognizant found guilty of discriminating against non-Indian employees
#5Seeing this happen at an originally Australian unicorn after the technical co-founder stepped down and new CTO swapped out all of their engineering leadership with Indian hires from Microsoft. Previously saw it at a lesser degree to older unicorns and places like Oracle, IBM, etc. Although it’s normalised in the latter ones.
The problem is that every Fortune 500’s internal systems are hooked up to it.
Re: Cognizant found guilty of discriminating against non-Indian employees
#6Is anyone really surprised? At the risk of sounding racist (though I'm Indian, so I guess I get some leeway here), there are likely more biases at play than it seems. You’ll see South or North Indians from a particular state prefer hiring employees from the same state, who speak the same language, and who look like them. And it doesn’t stop there. Caste discrimination plays a role too, and it even has its own Wiki pa…
Re: Cognizant found guilty of discriminating against non-Indian employees
#7Seeing this happen at an originally Australian unicorn after the technical co-founder stepped down and new CTO swapped out all of their engineering leadership with Indian hires from Microsoft. Previously saw it at a lesser degree to older unicorns and places like Oracle, IBM, etc. Although it’s normalised in the latter ones.
Which explains why its market value is hovering at $160 while its former worth, when it was properly managed, was $3-400. Am I spot on? The problem is that every Fortune 500’s internal systems are hooked up to it.
Re: Cognizant found guilty of discriminating against non-Indian employees
#8Is anyone really surprised? At the risk of sounding racist (though I'm Indian, so I guess I get some leeway here), there are likely more biases at play than it seems. You’ll see South or North Indians from a particular state prefer hiring employees from the same state, who speak the same language, and who look like them. And it doesn’t stop there. Caste discrimination plays a role too, and it even has its own Wiki pa…
It’s the discrimination version of the world’s largest choose your own adventure book.
Re: Cognizant found guilty of discriminating against non-Indian employees
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which explains why its market value is hovering at $160 while its former worth, when it was properly managed, was $3-400. Am I spot on? The problem is that every Fortune 500’s internal systems are hooked up to it.
Atlassian? As a user, I haven't noticed any decline in quality; it's just as painful to use now as it was a decade ago.
Re: Cognizant found guilty of discriminating against non-Indian employees
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
Atlassian? As a user, I haven't noticed any decline in quality; it's just as painful to use now as it was a decade ago.
It’s also probably 5x more expensive than a decade ago. As you said, still painful to use.