Live data from Hacker News

Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated

twitter.com

141–150 of 433 posts

Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated

#141

Drives me nuts. The internet is dead. I just bought a home and I have been googling the best way to tackle certain home improvement projects - like how to prepare trim for painting. Virtually every result is some kind of content farm of AI-generated bullshit with advertising between every paragraph, an autoplay video (completely unrelated) that scrolls with the page, a modal popup asking me to accept cookies, a secon…

> For better or worse, Reddit is really the only place to go find legitimate information anymore.

This is frightening and, I fear, true.

But I'd also add one odd little counterpoint: some of the most useful discussions and learning experiences I've had in the last four years have happened in private Facebook groups. As soon as the incentive to build a following using growth-hacking and AI -- which private groups mitigate to a greater extent -- is taken away, you get back to the helpful stuff.

The FreeCAD group on Facebook is great, for example. And there are private photography groups, 3D printing groups, music groups etc., where people have an incentive to be authentic.

Public Facebook feeds are drowning in AI slop. But people who manage their own groups are keeping the spirit alive. It's almost at the point where I think Facebook will ultimately morph into a paid groups platform.

Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated

#142

Almost all of the "product X vs Y" results are AI ramblings now. This growth of the dead Internet is making me want to sign up for Kagi. We're going to need a certification for human generated content at some point.

My memory is that these were pretty terrible long before the generative ai boom.

Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated

#143

Make a search engine that doesn’t have AI result except when I specifically ask for it, or you soon won’t have a search engine business. A really quick fix is to search with “-ai” and that Google doesn’t do this implicitly for images is really strange.

The hard part is identifying what's AI generated and what's not.

Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated

#144
A lot of comments amount to: "Internet is dead". AI is crap for sure but far from making Internet dead or useless. Consider: - emails, - bills and payments, - banking, - searching for and buying stuff (assuming you already know what you want that is), - calls/chats - whatsapp, messenger, etc. - youtube (for learning), - social stuff - however bad.

AI? This shall pass too. Internet will find its way.

Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated

#145

I wonder: do all the HNers who are excited about their GenAI product or wrapper or startup understand, at a fundamental level, that they are an intrinsic part of this deterioration? Or is this one of those fundamental attribution error things: - MY product is a powerful tool for creators who wish to save time - THEIR product is just a poorly-though-out slop generator Does it occur to people to instead be part of some…

Are you saying AI isn’t useful? My product is painstakingly crafted and uses AI but in my opinion it uses it tastefully and with great utility. Also 95%+ of my development efforts are not on improving the AI even though I use a .ai TLD. I think it’s crazy for a modern company/product _not_ to use AI, and the grifters building clear wrappers for GPT and other insanely low-quality efforts are already pretty much dead.

> Are you saying AI isn’t useful? My product is painstakingly crafted and uses AI but in my opinion it uses it tastefully and with great utility.

Sure. And THEIR products are just thoughtless slop generators.

Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated

#146

I'm at a juncture in my career where I'm asking what could really motivate me to do anything that I really feel is worth doing in tech. In my earlier years I remember using both CompuServe and Prodigy. I'm not sure if it just hindsight colored by nostalgia, but I yern for the feeling I had as a young teenager when I could explore a quirky and curated world of information. I'm starting to think that all this AI stuff…

We could also have a public library but for the Internet. A list of sites and articles curated and maintained by librarians and experts and paid for by local taxes.

Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated

#148

I wonder: do all the HNers who are excited about their GenAI product or wrapper or startup understand, at a fundamental level, that they are an intrinsic part of this deterioration? Or is this one of those fundamental attribution error things: - MY product is a powerful tool for creators who wish to save time - THEIR product is just a poorly-though-out slop generator Does it occur to people to instead be part of some…

[flagged]

Luckily I genuinely don't care :-)

Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated

#149

Almost all of the "product X vs Y" results are AI ramblings now. This growth of the dead Internet is making me want to sign up for Kagi. We're going to need a certification for human generated content at some point.

We need certification for human generated content for yesterday.

Not only that, we desperately need cryptographic prof that content X was produced by person Y.

Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated

#150

I wonder: do all the HNers who are excited about their GenAI product or wrapper or startup understand, at a fundamental level, that they are an intrinsic part of this deterioration? Or is this one of those fundamental attribution error things: - MY product is a powerful tool for creators who wish to save time - THEIR product is just a poorly-though-out slop generator Does it occur to people to instead be part of some…

Sure but doesn't every technological development have these tradeoffs? You could say what you say about anyone at any time. Where do you draw the line? I guarantee you'll be guilty of the exact same thing. I don't want to generalize, but IMO this sentiment of yours, I hear most loudly from software engineers far removed from ordinary non-technical end users: is making beautiful new LISPs and CNIs and Python package a…

The problem with this line of reasoning is that things can get steadily worse and you'll never be allowed to say or do anything about it.

No, everything is not the same as everything else.

Post reply on HN