It's not even the right terminology. I think you should probably use "peafowl". The search "peafowl chicks" seems to return all real images.
Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated
41–50 of 433 posts
Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated
#42I stopped using Google search...why even bother now. Results are just some crappy page with ads. Aastroturfed wikpedia page is also suspect. Chatgpt can answer questions in seconds. Just not sure if correct, but most of the time more than good enough. I feel like Google is destroying their credibility by day. Just go to zoo to see peacocks and take pictures. At least it will be an real experience not some virtual man…
The described problem is AI-slop in Google, and your solution is to drink directly from the spigot of ChatGPT?
Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated
#43In the near future, a significant portion of YouTube videos and podcasts will likely be AI-generated (e.g., through tools like Notebook LM). However, I'm uncertain whether audiences will truly enjoy this AI-generated content. Personally, I prefer content created by humans—it feels more authentic and engaging to me. It’s crucial for AI tools to include robust detection mechanisms, such as reliable watermarks, to help…
[deleted]
Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated
#44In the near future, a significant portion of YouTube videos and podcasts will likely be AI-generated (e.g., through tools like Notebook LM). However, I'm uncertain whether audiences will truly enjoy this AI-generated content. Personally, I prefer content created by humans—it feels more authentic and engaging to me. It’s crucial for AI tools to include robust detection mechanisms, such as reliable watermarks, to help…
At Listen Notes, we recently removed over 500 fake podcasts generated by Notebook LM in just the past weekend.
It's disappointing to see scammers and black-hat SEOs already leveraging Notebook LM to mass-produce fake podcasts and distribute them across various platforms.
Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated
#45In the near future, a significant portion of YouTube videos and podcasts will likely be AI-generated (e.g., through tools like Notebook LM). However, I'm uncertain whether audiences will truly enjoy this AI-generated content. Personally, I prefer content created by humans—it feels more authentic and engaging to me. It’s crucial for AI tools to include robust detection mechanisms, such as reliable watermarks, to help…
Question is how long till you can’t tell the difference
My FAANG working spouse thinks that AIs and Robocallers should be mandated to identify themselves. She thinks a audible "Beep-boop" at the end of a sentence for calls and video would be appropriate.
Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated
#46Wouldn't surprise me if in a few years Google, for certain keywords:
- autogenerates URLs (tha look legit)
- autogenerates content for such URLs (that look kinda legit)
All of this would be possible if one is using Chrome (otherwise the fake URLs wouldn't lead to anywhere). Of course, full of ads.
Think about it, some people are not really looking for some web site that talks about "baby peacocks". They are looking for baby peacocks: content, images, video. If Google can autogenerate good-enough content, then these kind of users would be satisfied (may not even notice the difference).
Maybe Google ditches the URL and all: type keywords, and get content (with ads)!
Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated
#47Well, nearly all of the Google Images results for "Woman" show a woman with makeup and additionally the photos were altered via Photoshop.
We have been creating our own reality even before AI.
Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated
#48Google is going to have to solve for this somehow if they want to remain relevant, right? If searching for an image and generating the image yield the same result, what's the point of image search any more?
Maybe they will generate the images themselves and show a mix of both.
Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated
#49In the near future, a significant portion of YouTube videos and podcasts will likely be AI-generated (e.g., through tools like Notebook LM). However, I'm uncertain whether audiences will truly enjoy this AI-generated content. Personally, I prefer content created by humans—it feels more authentic and engaging to me. It’s crucial for AI tools to include robust detection mechanisms, such as reliable watermarks, to help…
Question is how long till you can’t tell the difference
It's almost impossible now. NotebookLM really impressed me. I knew voice synthesis has gotten better than Stephen Hawking's "voice" but I really wasn't expecting having two realistic voices with emotions that even banter with each other. There is a bit of banality to them - they like to call something a "a game changer" practically every "podcast" and the insights into the material is pretty shallow, but they are probably better than the average podcaster already.
Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated
#50I was searching google images for "cat professor" recently.
Same, as far as I could tell all AI garbage with weird saturation and colors and uncanny valley .... they look weird / didn't work for me.