Live data from Hacker News

Parody Critiques Popular Khan Academy Videos

chronicle.com

11–20 of 48 posts

Re: Parody Critiques Popular Khan Academy Videos

#12
FTA:

>Salman Khan, uses positive and negative signs inconsistently and mixes up transitive and associative properties.

Oh, the irony: Khan actually confused the commutative and transitive properties. The parody video gets it right: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hC0MV843_Ng#t=3m14s

This stuff is hard. To be fair, I don't think Khan is doing any worst than a first-year teacher in his first class of the day.

Youtube provides annotations – I wonder why KA doesn't insert crowdsourced corrections the instant a mistake is made? It seems like a good middle ground between his "write-only" philosophy (which has made him incredibly prolific) and the legitimate criticisms that quality has suffered as a result. This video was corrected, but I'm sure there's countless other small mistakes that could benefit from a change in process, not just a PR band-aid.

Re: Parody Critiques Popular Khan Academy Videos

#14
post #9
post #8

I do agree with some of the issues presented here. Khan teaches you how to solve many math problems, but he rarely mentions how you could use it in real life . But if you go to the Q&A section you will rarely see this brought up. I do find it appalling that their approach is making a parody video instead of presenting a better solution. Instead of wasting their time—and mine— making fun of Khan, it would have been im…

If you sit and watch the video itself it's a very mild form of parody. They are actually commenting on the presentation given by the Khan Academy video and their comments make clear how they believe multiplication of negative numbers should be taught.

That, plus it's a way to get attention.

A mild critique written up in a small corner of the internet is likely never to be seen by most.

Any publicity is good publicity, and I think these individuals definitely want to help.

Re: Parody Critiques Popular Khan Academy Videos

#15
"But the professors say their bigger gripe is with the procedural, rules-based approach in all of Mr. Khan’s videos."

Well, that's how they teach it in public school, here are the steps, no explanation of why it works, just accept that it works and memorize the steps. So if you want to attack teaching the procedure instead of the concept, look at just about every math teacher in K-12 first.

Re: Parody Critiques Popular Khan Academy Videos

#16
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't understand. Are you disagreeing? I think leaving the mistake and correcting later is very confusing and possibly discouraging to students. What is your response to that?

I think leaving the mistake and correcting later is very confusing and possibly discouraging to students. What is your response to that? In the same video, note your mistake and correct it.

That would be better. I think a lot of times he doesn't realize the mistakes until they've been published. And maybe he has a rule he doesn't re-edit videos after they've been published?

I just remember getting incredibly frustrated after basically learning the wrong thing in the first video and then having it corrected in the second.

Re: Parody Critiques Popular Khan Academy Videos

#17
What is a good non-rules-based approach to teaching why a negative times a negative is a positive? I've seen a proof-through-absurdity showing that if -1 * -1 = -1, then you can make 0 = 2, and a proof using all three negativity permutations, and setting two different distributions equal, showing that ab = (-a)(-b), but the math for both of those approaches seems to be more advanced than the rule.

Re: Parody Critiques Popular Khan Academy Videos

#19
I went to a government high school in the 90's in South Africa. Experienced teachers were given early retirement and replaced by younger teachers who, through a combination of ineptitude and inexperience, struggled to teach.

My grade 10 and 11 maths teacher couldn't factorise polynomials consistently. She'd often get stuck while halfway through a problem while working on the blackboard. Euclidian geometry was a challenge, and she failed to communicate theorem proving techniques. My Grade 12 (final year) maths teacher was promoted out after 3 months, and replaced by someone who didn't appear in class regularly.

I went for additional after-school maths tution, and I did very well during the exams in the topics that were covered there, but unfortunately we couldn't redo the whole syllabus. So my Higher Grade C for maths, although better than the majority of students in my school (and the country I guess, which has very low, and still-dropping educational standards) was disappointing.

We also had serious problems with our science teacher - retired, and replaced with someone who also never really used to pitch up. My parents bought me physics videos from the Learning Channel, a video-based system, and I managed to get an A. Unfortunately their budget didn't stretch far enough to buy the maths videos as well.

I have watched Khan's videos and I always wish that that sort of service was around back when I was in school. Yes, I, and most of my friends may have been deprived of some conceptual understanding, but at least we would have gotten some teaching. Something is better than nothing, at least for those of us who don't live in US College towns.

Post reply on HN