Live data from Hacker News

DOSBox-X: Enhanced Fork of DOSBox for Expanded DOS and Retro PC Support

github.com

21–30 of 44 posts

Re: DOSBox-X: Enhanced Fork of DOSBox for Expanded DOS and Retro PC Support

#21
post #15

One of my crowning achievements(?) was using DOSbox for actual work purposes. In 2010-14 I worked at large retailer that still did almost half their development in RPG running on IBM iSeries. Part of onboarding for new devs was this series of training software modules that went over the fundamentals of the RPG language. It was boring, but very thorough. It clearly had been purchased in the late 90s and kept in use si…

I have a DOSbox story as well. A customer requested an emergency change to some firmware that was built for an old 8051-based platform. We had a single instance of the compiler from [redacted] available on a PC that was left in a closet for a decade or so. The compiler maker was still in business but wanted 15 years of extortion-level "retroactive support" payments to let us move the license to a newer machine, and I…

Good for an emergency, but I'd make sure to calmly move to an open 8051 compiler.

Because screw that awful vendor.

Re: DOSBox-X: Enhanced Fork of DOSBox for Expanded DOS and Retro PC Support

#22
post #6

DOSBox has many many forks https://emulation.gametechwiki.com/index.php/DOSBox https://github.com/dosbox-staging/dosbox-staging/wiki/DOSBox... Personally I use DOSBox Pure with RetroArch

I like the -X fork because it adds a basic GUI, and menus on the Mac.

Re: DOSBox-X: Enhanced Fork of DOSBox for Expanded DOS and Retro PC Support

#23
post #13

86box is also great, especially for retro PC gaming support. I can run Windows 98 with a Pentium 233 MMX and Voodoo3 on relatively modest hardware. (AMD 7840HS) https://86box.net

Also PCem, which is has a faster dynamic recompiler and supports a few more hardware configs afaik. But hasn't been updated in a couple of years. There's also UniPCem, which I think is a fork/port of PCem, and more recently updated. But I haven't tried it.

86box is itself a fork of PCem.

Re: DOSBox-X: Enhanced Fork of DOSBox for Expanded DOS and Retro PC Support

#25
post #6

DOSBox has many many forks https://emulation.gametechwiki.com/index.php/DOSBox https://github.com/dosbox-staging/dosbox-staging/wiki/DOSBox... Personally I use DOSBox Pure with RetroArch

For me I find "DOSBox Staging" works best. I prefer to do the config in a .conf file instead of GUI

It also has native Mac Apple Silicon build. I find something very satisfying with emulating DOS and Windows 95 on a very fast non-x86 machine.

Re: DOSBox-X: Enhanced Fork of DOSBox for Expanded DOS and Retro PC Support

#27
post #15

One of my crowning achievements(?) was using DOSbox for actual work purposes. In 2010-14 I worked at large retailer that still did almost half their development in RPG running on IBM iSeries. Part of onboarding for new devs was this series of training software modules that went over the fundamentals of the RPG language. It was boring, but very thorough. It clearly had been purchased in the late 90s and kept in use si…

Shouldn't large enterprises requiring DOS go for a virtual machine instead?

Re: DOSBox-X: Enhanced Fork of DOSBox for Expanded DOS and Retro PC Support

#28
post #9
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I found DOSBox-ECE more stable than DOSBox-X. I believe they provide similar set of features. EDIT: Oops, talked too soon. Apparently DOSBox-ECE has been EOLed :(

My experience with dosbox-x is similar. dosbox-staging is probably the most stable and it's still updated.

Thanks! DOSBox Staging also comes with better CRT emulation defaults which is a bonus.

Re: DOSBox-X: Enhanced Fork of DOSBox for Expanded DOS and Retro PC Support

#29

Whenever I see a DOS thread, I like to remind people of eXoDOS, one of the most impressive archival efforts of every DOS game ever. Complete with manual scans, extras, and all neatly sorted in a launcher.

Thanks for mentioning that. Didn't knew it existed, looks fantastic to keep as historical record before it is lost in the sands of time.
Post reply on HN