It has a non-commercial cc-by-nc-4.0 license, I would guess the only way to use this in production is to use Nvidias data centers to host it? Or are there other ways?
Not a lawyer, not legal advice, but... the legal status quo is that neural network outputs are not copyrightable. They are currently considered not made by humans nor considered a derivative work from the training material / network weights (assuming it's not regurgitating copyrighted material verbatim). The cc-by-nc-4.0 license applies to the network weights. The only thing non-commercial about the license is that i…
Nvidia releases NVLM 1.0 72B open weight model
21–30 of 57 posts
Re: Nvidia releases NVLM 1.0 72B open weight model
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, I never said that. But you already know that. The robot in this case is me holding a smart phone.
Is that faster than just determining by touch what type of garment something is? Or is this about sorting by color?
Re: Nvidia releases NVLM 1.0 72B open weight model
#23Reminder that Nvidia is still the only company making any money out of the "AI revolution".
i have yet to hear of anyone actually using AI for something properly only exception im excited about is the non-main characters from video games, where a lot of the random NPCs, can now actually bring some more fun to the game.
Re: Nvidia releases NVLM 1.0 72B open weight model
#24It has a non-commercial cc-by-nc-4.0 license, I would guess the only way to use this in production is to use Nvidias data centers to host it? Or are there other ways?
Not a lawyer, not legal advice, but... the legal status quo is that neural network outputs are not copyrightable. They are currently considered not made by humans nor considered a derivative work from the training material / network weights (assuming it's not regurgitating copyrighted material verbatim). The cc-by-nc-4.0 license applies to the network weights. The only thing non-commercial about the license is that i…
Re: Nvidia releases NVLM 1.0 72B open weight model
#25Reminder that Nvidia is still the only company making any money out of the "AI revolution".
Wrong Midjourney is profitable. All the acquired startups (i.e. Streamlit or MosaicML) who made millions per employee "made money" for the people who cared.
OP was likely talking about profitability.
FWIW I wouldn’t really count streamlit as an ai company
Re: Nvidia releases NVLM 1.0 72B open weight model
#26Re: Nvidia releases NVLM 1.0 72B open weight model
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is that faster than just determining by touch what type of garment something is? Or is this about sorting by color?
Its for sorting by color/print. Some things you remember instantly by touch, others not so much.
Do you have any more info or links about the setup?
Re: Nvidia releases NVLM 1.0 72B open weight model
#28Re: Nvidia releases NVLM 1.0 72B open weight model
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wrong Midjourney is profitable. All the acquired startups (i.e. Streamlit or MosaicML) who made millions per employee "made money" for the people who cared.
Midjourney is one, but the others are not. Plenty of people “made money” at Twitter, but the company is a money pit. OP was likely talking about profitability. FWIW I wouldn’t really count streamlit as an ai company
Re: Nvidia releases NVLM 1.0 72B open weight model
#30Reminder that Nvidia is still the only company making any money out of the "AI revolution".
i have yet to hear of anyone actually using AI for something properly only exception im excited about is the non-main characters from video games, where a lot of the random NPCs, can now actually bring some more fun to the game.