> This is hard. Basic solutions use time after silence to ‘determine’ when someone has stopped talking. But it adds latency. If you tune it to be too short, the AI agent will talk over you. Too long, and it’ll take a while to respond. The model had to be dedicated to accurately detecting end-of-turn based on conversation signals, and speculating on inputs to get a head start. I spent time solving this exact problem a…
How do humans do it?
Show HN: A real time AI video agent with under 1 second of latency
201–210 of 264 posts
Re: Show HN: A real time AI video agent with under 1 second of latency
#202Is anyone else thinking that it might not be a good idea to give away your voice and face to a startup that is making digital clones of people?
This is a valid concern, but we’ve always been very serious about consent and privacy. Our models cannot be used without explicit verbal/visual consent and you hold the keys to your clone.
That's quite a commitment, guys, I am sold
/s
Re: Show HN: A real time AI video agent with under 1 second of latency
#203> This is hard. Basic solutions use time after silence to ‘determine’ when someone has stopped talking. But it adds latency. If you tune it to be too short, the AI agent will talk over you. Too long, and it’ll take a while to respond. The model had to be dedicated to accurately detecting end-of-turn based on conversation signals, and speculating on inputs to get a head start. I spent time solving this exact problem a…
How do humans do it?
Re: Show HN: A real time AI video agent with under 1 second of latency
#204Re: Show HN: A real time AI video agent with under 1 second of latency
#205Is anyone else thinking that it might not be a good idea to give away your voice and face to a startup that is making digital clones of people?
This is a valid concern, but we’ve always been very serious about consent and privacy. Our models cannot be used without explicit verbal/visual consent and you hold the keys to your clone.
Re: Show HN: A real time AI video agent with under 1 second of latency
#206I know nothing about this subject and I come to HN as basically an uneducated peasant. But I like technology and the discussion had here. You say responding quickly is critical and that makes sense. Humans will often do things like start by saying well or ummm, or short little utterances that allows us a second to process the information. Too much and it would probably feel like a bad trait but a little sprinkled in…
Theres a lot of micro behaviors that we're researching and building around that will continue to push the experience to be more and more natural
Re: Show HN: A real time AI video agent with under 1 second of latency
#207Re: Show HN: A real time AI video agent with under 1 second of latency
#208I was being generally antagonistic, saying you are going to use my voice and picture and put a cowboy hat on me and use my likeness without my concent, etc. etc. Just trying to troll the AI laughing the whole way.
Eventually, it gets pissed off and just goes entirely silent.. and it would say hi, but then not respond to any of my other questions. The whole thing was creepy, let alone getting a cold shoulder from an AI... That was a wierd experience with this thing and now i never want to use anything like that again lol.
Re: Show HN: A real time AI video agent with under 1 second of latency
#209Re: Show HN: A real time AI video agent with under 1 second of latency
#210What's the last thing an AI avatar will be able to, that any real human can do?