Live data from Hacker News

OpenAI DevDay 2024 live blog

simonwillison.net

41–50 of 99 posts

Re: OpenAI DevDay 2024 live blog

#42
post #30

I understand the Realtime API voice novelty, and the techonological achievement it is, but I don't see it from the product point of view. It looks like one of those startups finding a solution before knowing the problem. The two examples shown in the DevDay are the things I don't really want to do in the future. I don't want to talk to anybody, and I don't want to wait for their answer in a human form. That's why I o…

> I understand the Realtime API voice novelty, and the techonological achievement it is, but I don't see it from the product point of view. It looks like one of those startups finding a solution before knowing the problem.

The market for realistic voice agents is huge, but also very fragmented. Customer service is the obvious example, large companies employ tens of thousands of customer service phone agents, and a large # of those calls can be handled, at least in part, with a sufficiently smart voice agent.

Sales is another, just calling back leads and checking in on them. Voice clone the original sales agent, give the AI enough context about previous interactions, and a lot of boring legwork can be handled by AI.

Answering simple questions is another great example, restaurants get slammed with calls during their busiest hours (seriously getting ahold restaurant staff during peak hours can be literally impossible!) having an AI that can pick up the phone and answer basic questions (what's in certain dishes, what is the current wait time, what is the largest group that can be sat together, etc) is super useful.

A lot of small businesses with only a single employee can benefit from having a voice AI assistant picking up the phone and answering the easy everyday queries and then handing everything else off to the owner.

The key is that these voice AIs should be seamless, you ask your question, they answer, and you ideally don't even know it is an AI.

Re: OpenAI DevDay 2024 live blog

#43
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

AFAIK a lot of these ideas are not new (the JSON thing was done with OS models before) and OpenAI is possibly the hottest startup with the most funding this decade (maybe even past two decades?), so I think this is actually all within expectations.

They're exceptional at executing and delivering, you don't get that just through having more funding.

How are they exceptional?

Their web UI was a glitchy mess for over a year. Rollouts of just data is staggered and often delayed. They still can’t adhere to a JSON schema accurately, even though others have figured this out ages ago. There are global outages regularly. Etc…

I’m impressed by some aspects of their rapid growth, but these are financial achievements (credit due Sam) more than technical ones.

Re: OpenAI DevDay 2024 live blog

#45
post #6

> The Realtime API improves this by streaming audio inputs and outputs directly, enabling more natural conversational experiences. It can also handle interruptions automatically, much like Advanced Voice Mode in ChatGPT. > Under the hood, the Realtime API lets you create a persistent WebSocket connection to exchange messages with GPT-4o. The API supports function calling(opens in a new window), which makes it possibl…

yes it transcribes inputs automatically, but not in realtime.

outputs are sent in text + audio but you'll get the text very quickly and audio a bit slower, and of course the audio takes time to play back. the text also doesn't currently have timing cues so its up to you if you want to try to play it "in sync". if the user interrupts the audio, you need to send back a truncation event so it can roll its own context back, and if you never presented the text to the user you'll need to truncate it there as well to ensure your storage isn't polluted with fragments the user never heard.

Re: OpenAI DevDay 2024 live blog

#46
post #30

I understand the Realtime API voice novelty, and the techonological achievement it is, but I don't see it from the product point of view. It looks like one of those startups finding a solution before knowing the problem. The two examples shown in the DevDay are the things I don't really want to do in the future. I don't want to talk to anybody, and I don't want to wait for their answer in a human form. That's why I o…

keep in mind that this is just v1 of the realtime api. they'll add realtime vision/video down the road which can also have wide applications beyond synchronous communication.

Re: OpenAI DevDay 2024 live blog

#47
post #42
post #30

I understand the Realtime API voice novelty, and the techonological achievement it is, but I don't see it from the product point of view. It looks like one of those startups finding a solution before knowing the problem. The two examples shown in the DevDay are the things I don't really want to do in the future. I don't want to talk to anybody, and I don't want to wait for their answer in a human form. That's why I o…

> I understand the Realtime API voice novelty, and the techonological achievement it is, but I don't see it from the product point of view. It looks like one of those startups finding a solution before knowing the problem. The market for realistic voice agents is huge, but also very fragmented. Customer service is the obvious example, large companies employ tens of thousands of customer service phone agents, and a la…

And after your mis-led by a sales agent, it doesn't make you as angry because it's just an AI.

Re: OpenAI DevDay 2024 live blog

#48
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

AFAIK a lot of these ideas are not new (the JSON thing was done with OS models before) and OpenAI is possibly the hottest startup with the most funding this decade (maybe even past two decades?), so I think this is actually all within expectations.

They're exceptional at executing and delivering, you don't get that just through having more funding.

It’s literally just a bunch of ex-stripe employees and data scientists..

Re: OpenAI DevDay 2024 live blog

#49
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They're exceptional at executing and delivering, you don't get that just through having more funding.

How are they exceptional? Their web UI was a glitchy mess for over a year. Rollouts of just data is staggered and often delayed. They still can’t adhere to a JSON schema accurately, even though others have figured this out ages ago. There are global outages regularly. Etc… I’m impressed by some aspects of their rapid growth, but these are financial achievements (credit due Sam) more than technical ones.

I have a few qualms with this app:

1. For a Linux user, you can already build such a system yourself quite trivially by getting an FTP account, mounting it locally with curlftpfs, and then using SVN or CVS on the mounted filesystem. From Windows or Mac, this FTP account could be accessed through built-in software.

2. It doesn't actually replace a USB drive. Most people I know e-mail files to themselves or host them somewhere online to be able to perform presentations, but they still carry a USB drive in case there are connectivity problems. This does not solve the connectivity issue.

3. It does not seem very "viral" or income-generating. I know this is premature at this point, but without charging users for the service, is it reasonable to expect to make money off of this?

Re: OpenAI DevDay 2024 live blog

#50
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They're exceptional at executing and delivering, you don't get that just through having more funding.

How are they exceptional? Their web UI was a glitchy mess for over a year. Rollouts of just data is staggered and often delayed. They still can’t adhere to a JSON schema accurately, even though others have figured this out ages ago. There are global outages regularly. Etc… I’m impressed by some aspects of their rapid growth, but these are financial achievements (credit due Sam) more than technical ones.

Not sure why you are being downvoted. You are generally right. Most of their new product rollouts were acoompanied with huge production instabilities for paying customers. Only in the most recent ones did they manage that better.

> They still can’t adhere to a JSON schema accurately

Strict mode for structured output fixes at least this though.

Post reply on HN