Small3dlib: Public domain 3D software rasterizer

For the second paragraph, I agree with you personally. While I can think of the nudism counterargument ("nudity should not be sexual"), it is true that in current society, nudity is unfortunately sexual, and the collection part of it makes it suspicious that it is a sexual endeavor (e.g. even in the nudism community, a "collection of nudist pictures" is often suspected to be porn [and thus not genuinely nudist], especially if it is sold, even if the pictures were non-sexual). Therefore, I agree with you that I believe this was likely a sexual act by the author, even though the pictures themselves may not actually be sexual (as the nudist community has experienced).

If we assume that it was sexual, then to make the jump to conclude that it was intolerable, we can actually depend on what the anti-contact (a stronger version of non-contact) minor attraction community says. They are, of course, strongly against it as well, on the grounds that the production (and therefore the encouragement of production) of CSAM harms children. [1] Therefore, please know that I agree with you, and in fact, anti-contact MAPs and anti-contact pedophiles agree with you too. None of these groups want to harm children, and in fact, resources are provided in the groups to report and prevent child abuse and CSAM.

Note that there are of course some counterarguments. For instance, Aaron Swartz said: "This is absurd logic. Child pornography is not necessarily abuse. Even if it was, preventing the distribution or posession of the evidence won't make the abuse go away. We don't arrest everyone with videotapes of murders, or make it illegal for TV stations to show people being killed." [2]. But that's a separate argument, not related to anti-contact or non-contact MAPs, which was what I was focusing on in my original comment.

[1] https://www.mapresources.info/guides/csam

[2] https://web.archive.org/web/20031229025933/http:/bits.are.no...

TLDR: Thank you, and I agree with you (though I had to explain why I agree), and anti-contact MAPs agree with you too.

- I have a condition which makes me physically unable to bear seeing or hearing just 1 second of ads.

- I am immune to propaganda and see the world in undistorted way, resulting in previous point.

- My favorite algorithm is most likely Hough transform.

- It physically hurts me when someone says "the reason ... is because" or "just because ... doesn't mean".

- I immediately turn off any documentary where a woman starts talking as a "scientist"."

Ah, I miss personal webpages.

Reminds me of an article which said that positive side of autism is that autists are impossible to brainwash, and that they are the only ones to speak up in a nazi society -- because they ignore the social cues.

> 1. Show them some love, even if they don't deserve it

That's the problem. Everyone deserves love, but it's a bit of a chicken & egg problem when you run into someone who thinks of themselves as so repulsive, that they are convinced they don't deserve being loved.

My personal experience in this area has mostly been with people who already have been in therapy, sought help, etc and sometimes even then have problems accepting love, even when offered unconditionally (which might be also super difficult for the offering side).

But you're right, even a little bit of love and well-intentioned attention can go a long way. I hope that if drummyfish is reading this entire thread (which might be extremely emotionally demanding), they can see that the appreciation for their work and achievements is well-earned and deserved.

The root of the problem and the solution is (and always has been) to love oneself. If one can't accept self-love, how would they be able to accept love from others?

Everyone believes in race realism. It's only when it's about a few specific traits of a few specific groups that people deny it. And it's only about one specific organ of the human body (the most complex one), that somehow is completely identical for everyone.