Live data from Hacker News

Amusing Ourselves to Death (2009)

web.archive.org

221–230 of 352 posts

Re: Amusing Ourselves to Death (2009)

#221

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Are you aware of widespread fraud in the data associated with insect population decline? Or are you arguing that science is just inherently fraudulent or unreliable? These sound like pretty extreme responses of the type ancaps gave for years to the claim that global surface temperatures were rising. Those looked pretty quaint even without the benefit if hindsight.

I am arguing that scientific data is unreliable in general.

Re: Amusing Ourselves to Death (2009)

#222
For those who haven’t read the book, Amusing Ourselves to Death is incredible, and absolutely worth reading. One of my mentors gave it to me years ago and it became one of those mind blowing reads.

In the book, Postman analyzes how media affects humans and society. He basically gives a framework for predicting and understanding the effects of different types of media. The book was written before social media, so the examples are books, newspapers, tv, radio, etc. But so much of social media seems obvious once you read his analysis.

Every time I see the typical discussion (person A: social media makes people dumb; person B: Plato said books make people dumb) I think that the discussion could use some Postman - not all media affects us in the same way - some media encourages behaviors that are good for society, and some media encourages behaviors that are bad for society.

Re: Amusing Ourselves to Death (2009)

#223

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Doubt is not a strategy and nay-saying rarely moves a conversation forward. My comment was not intended to illicit the abdication of responsibility - quite the reverse. Where was my petitioning? Your response is combative, seemingly intended to be personally offensive and built on a straw-man argument, likely the result of a multitude of others treating your opinions like crap. I'm not them... You are absolutely righ…

My more relevant point to the OP, with reference to your comment, is that no, we are not amusing ourselves to death. It's more that we are worrying ourselves to death, despite a lack of personal indicators about this or that. If you want to proceed meaningfully to self, this requires prioritising one's personal experience over the provided stats, which are as much a control/guidance mechanism as anything.

Re: Amusing Ourselves to Death (2009)

#224
post #206

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have lived in South Florida, close to the Atlantic ocean for close to 40 years. In the time I have lived here, the insect populations have noticeably dropped. I have also queried relatives from the midwest. It used to be every summer your car would get covered with dead bugs, not so any more. As for plastics in the ocean, every time I go to the beach I see a lot of macro plastics.

Thank you for your personal testimony. It's good to hear that in your experience it seems that the insect populations really have dropped. Of course, there may be other reasons - eg if there are highways where it used to be small roads, you would expect insects to stay clear of the area. Also, litter you can see, is not microplastics - you can't see the microplastics.... But they are there! Apparently.

So, objective science is untrustworthy and subjective testimony is easily explained away. Let me guess - only your opinion is the one that matters.

You have a poorly-crafted answer for both sides of the coin, but also fail to read the details of the things you oppose.

Re: Amusing Ourselves to Death (2009)

#225

The book came out in 2005. Was there any follow up, I didn't see one on the wiki. It seems like we are accelerating to this. Even the changes between 2005 and 2024. Near 20 years, we've leaned into the Huxley vision. Really leaned into it. This is all getting really scary. I feel like we should do something. We should really band together and change course. I volunteer to go out and do something, except of course, I'…

The book came out in 1985. The author was already dead in 2005.

Re: Amusing Ourselves to Death (2009)

#226

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think they mean the literal opposite of things staying the same, not the "helping people" idiom.

Fair enough, but for the sake of this conversation, if we say 'good' values are those that keep things from staying the same, aren't the values of smart people just as likely to evolve towards 'bad' ones? For example, I'm sure most people know at least one smart person who only plays video games; it does seem that we'll keep inventing forms of entertainment that wirehead people more and more effectively, which seems…

[deleted]

Re: Amusing Ourselves to Death (2009)

#227
post #225

The book came out in 2005. Was there any follow up, I didn't see one on the wiki. It seems like we are accelerating to this. Even the changes between 2005 and 2024. Near 20 years, we've leaned into the Huxley vision. Really leaned into it. This is all getting really scary. I feel like we should do something. We should really band together and change course. I volunteer to go out and do something, except of course, I'…

The book came out in 1985. The author was already dead in 2005.

Missed that.

It was re-issued in 2005. For 20th anniversary.

So nearly 40 years.

Re: Amusing Ourselves to Death (2009)

#228
post #56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which is not really wrong. Chess can be fun, but I always thought it is pretty fascinating that the chess champions are viewed by the media as some kind of genius. I mean, it's just a game, not more but also not less.

Yeah, if you spend your life solving crossword puzzles, you end up intellectually poor by most standards. Note that this might also hold to some degree for computer programming.

I don't think that's true, let alone self-evident.

In any case, a life spent solving crossword puzzles would almost certainly deliver more positive net effects to the "player" (and society at large) than a person spending a lifetime getting good at chess. It really is odd that chess is considered so refined, laudable, etc. We probably shouldn't put it on a pedestal any higher than where we place video games.

(In fact, video games might actually be better—and I'm not saying that as someone staring up from a batch of sour grapes and/or looking for an excuse to play video games; that's not how I spend my time.)

Re: Amusing Ourselves to Death (2009)

#229

For those who haven’t read the book, Amusing Ourselves to Death is incredible, and absolutely worth reading. One of my mentors gave it to me years ago and it became one of those mind blowing reads. In the book, Postman analyzes how media affects humans and society. He basically gives a framework for predicting and understanding the effects of different types of media. The book was written before social media, so the…

> I think that the discussion could use some Postman - not all media affects us in the same way - some media encourages behaviors that are good for society, and some media encourages behaviors that are bad for society.

I think media simply mostly brings out the behaviors already inherent to people. If a shitty person sees their behavior validated in media, they are now more likely to act it out in real life. Likewise for good behaviors.

Some people are definitely more susceptible to such influence than others.

Re: Amusing Ourselves to Death (2009)

#230

For those who haven’t read the book, Amusing Ourselves to Death is incredible, and absolutely worth reading. One of my mentors gave it to me years ago and it became one of those mind blowing reads. In the book, Postman analyzes how media affects humans and society. He basically gives a framework for predicting and understanding the effects of different types of media. The book was written before social media, so the…

Precisely - the medium is the message. Books are slow, deliberate, require imagination and attention. Seven second tiktok videos are the opposite. The method by which we consume the information impacts us just as much if not more than its content.
Post reply on HN