[flagged]
I didn't downvote that comment when you commented, but I did it now. I don't come to HN to read the auto-generated output of a system. If I wanted that I could generate the result myself. I come to HN because I'm interested in what people in the community have to say. Showing up to a thread and saying "this is what an LLM generated" does not "gratify my intellectual curiosity" (per the FAQ) and, in my opinion, is not…
I'd say an audio discussion of this 100+ page dissertation is directly gratifying my intellectual curiosity, if I'm someone who is interested but doesn't have time to skim 100+ pages. And yeah anyone could figure out how to do such a thing, but a) most people don't even know it's possible yet, b) it presumably takes some amount of expertise and/or paid credits, and c) it saves people time. I'd consider it to be pretty similar to the usual archive link comments, in that way; anyone could probably find it themselves, but they might not even think to try.
Finally, if I had to quote any one part of the guidelines to support my "LLMs are welcome on HN" claim:
Please don't use Hacker News for political or ideological battle. That tramples curiosity.
The guidelines don't mention any sort of institutionalized human-centric speciesism, so I'd say it's fair game. As my fave philosopher David Gunkel says: #RobotRights ;)Obviously you're 100% correct to downvote a comment you think is distracting, I just thought I'd share my response on the broader question.