21–30 of 136 posts
They've recently renamed Outlook to Outlook (classic). So you can see which way the wind is blowing on this. Outlook (new) is still missing tons of big features and the UI sucks.
It is so easy to instantiate and use old outlook that I really fail to understand what is their endgame with this killing of a top and well respected product.
Meanwhile, Thunderbird is rolling out MS Exchange capability by v130 (which I am hoping must be very soon)
They've recently renamed Outlook to Outlook (classic). So you can see which way the wind is blowing on this. Outlook (new) is still missing tons of big features and the UI sucks.
They've recently renamed Outlook to Outlook (classic). So you can see which way the wind is blowing on this. Outlook (new) is still missing tons of big features and the UI sucks.
Outlook new is missing one fundamental feature which is automation. This blob of html can not be programmed unlike predecessors for more 15 years. It is so easy to instantiate and use old outlook that I really fail to understand what is their endgame with this killing of a top and well respected product.
This of course only works with exchange afaik, but why else would I use outlook.
Meanwhile, Thunderbird is rolling out MS Exchange capability by v130 (which I am hoping must be very soon)
Break them up. We need revised antitrust laws.
I think yes, and it really boils down to role separation. For everything. An example being cable companies. They should have no capability to own TV stations, media creators, news companies, the list goes on. Backbone is backbone, be it an internet connection, or a TV/video feed. Back to Microsoft you can make an OS, or you can make apps, but not both. An OS being a 'backbone'. Applies to Google. "Search" vs "Ads". B…
Does Google search become a paid subscription product in your vision of separation of search vs ads?