Earlier quoted context omitted.
...I'm not at all clear what this external review would be for either the UK or Switzerland.
Under a strict reading of the AI Act, advanced voice mode would be illegal because it is the "use of AI systems to infer emotions of a natural person in the areas of workplace and education institutions, except where the use of AI system is intended to be put in place or into the market for medical or safety reasons"
OpenAI rolls out Advanced Voice Mode with more voices and a new look
61–70 of 85 posts
Re: OpenAI rolls out Advanced Voice Mode with more voices and a new look
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
The blocker definitely isn't the current users of the application, but all the people involved in the creation of the training data.
I dont understand what this statement has to do with the conversation regarding releasing a new voice mode over an existing model thats allowed in the UK
But yes, the fact is I can't think of any meaningful reason why UK legislation would impact Advanced Voice but not the previous model releases.
Re: OpenAI rolls out Advanced Voice Mode with more voices and a new look
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
Under a strict reading of the AI Act, advanced voice mode would be illegal because it is the "use of AI systems to infer emotions of a natural person in the areas of workplace and education institutions, except where the use of AI system is intended to be put in place or into the market for medical or safety reasons"
But the AI Act doesn't apply in the UK, and as far as I know doesn't in Switzerland either...?
It's just speculation on my part that that's the actual reason for some of those markets.
It might have to do with (old) EU specific regulations. I know the UK adopted many EU laws to expedite brexit.
Re: OpenAI rolls out Advanced Voice Mode with more voices and a new look
#64Re: OpenAI rolls out Advanced Voice Mode with more voices and a new look
#65Re: OpenAI rolls out Advanced Voice Mode with more voices and a new look
#66> Advanced Voice is not yet available in the EU, the UK, Switzerland, Iceland, Norway, and Liechtenstein. That's disappointing. I wonder if it's related to legal issues, technical issues, or just doing a phased rollout?
I initially thought this had to do with regulation as well, but people trying it over a VPN are complaining about latency, which makes me believe there's a technical (deployment regions) reason for it as well (Also language reasons as well - though it seems it works with other languages) How well does it work in the UK (and understanding its regional accents?)
Re: OpenAI rolls out Advanced Voice Mode with more voices and a new look
#67[flagged]
Re: OpenAI rolls out Advanced Voice Mode with more voices and a new look
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
...I'm not at all clear what this external review would be for either the UK or Switzerland.
Under a strict reading of the AI Act, advanced voice mode would be illegal because it is the "use of AI systems to infer emotions of a natural person in the areas of workplace and education institutions, except where the use of AI system is intended to be put in place or into the market for medical or safety reasons"
Re: OpenAI rolls out Advanced Voice Mode with more voices and a new look
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
But the AI Act doesn't apply in the UK, and as far as I know doesn't in Switzerland either...?
Sorry I don't think it does either. Kind of glazed over the fact you were talking about the UK specifically It's just speculation on my part that that's the actual reason for some of those markets. It might have to do with (old) EU specific regulations. I know the UK adopted many EU laws to expedite brexit.
Re: OpenAI rolls out Advanced Voice Mode with more voices and a new look
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
Under a strict reading of the AI Act, advanced voice mode would be illegal because it is the "use of AI systems to infer emotions of a natural person in the areas of workplace and education institutions, except where the use of AI system is intended to be put in place or into the market for medical or safety reasons"
How so (for personal use, at least)?
1. This is just speculation
2. It could just be enough reason to cause review