Google should just offer llama3 405b, maybe slightly fine tuned. Geminis are unusable.
how so?
81–90 of 151 posts
Google should just offer llama3 405b, maybe slightly fine tuned. Geminis are unusable.
how so?
This sounds interesting: "We will continue to offer a suite of safety filters that developers may apply to Google’s models. For the models released today, the filters will not be applied by default so that developers can determine the configuration best suited for their use case."
This is the most important update. Pricing and speed doesn't matter when your call fails because of "safety".
This is a query I did recently that got rejected for "safety" reasons:
Who are the current NFL starting QBs?
Controversial I know, I'm surprised I'd be willing to take the risk with submitting such a dangerous query to the model.
Google should just offer llama3 405b, maybe slightly fine tuned. Geminis are unusable.
In fact, Google is most likely _the_ target for that clause in the license.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wonder if they're pulling the wall-mart model. Ruthlessly cut costs and sell at-or-below costs until your competitors go out of business, then ratchet up the prices once you have market dominance.
Probably not. Do they really believe they are going to knock OpenAI out of business, when the OpenAI models are better? Instead I think they are going after the "Android model". Recognize they might not be able to dethrone the leader who invented the space. Define yourself in the marketplace as the cheaper alternative. "Less good but almost as good." In the end, they hope to be one of a small number of surviving memb…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wonder if they're pulling the wall-mart model. Ruthlessly cut costs and sell at-or-below costs until your competitors go out of business, then ratchet up the prices once you have market dominance.
Probably not. Do they really believe they are going to knock OpenAI out of business, when the OpenAI models are better? Instead I think they are going after the "Android model". Recognize they might not be able to dethrone the leader who invented the space. Define yourself in the marketplace as the cheaper alternative. "Less good but almost as good." In the end, they hope to be one of a small number of surviving memb…
I think this analysis is not in keeping with reality, and I doubt if that's their strategy.
Has anyone used Gemini Code Assist? I'm curious how it compares with Github Copilot and Cursor.
It makes sense I need to be careful not to commit secrets to public repositories but now I have to avoid not only saving credentials into a file but even to paste them by accident into my editor?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wonder if they're pulling the wall-mart model. Ruthlessly cut costs and sell at-or-below costs until your competitors go out of business, then ratchet up the prices once you have market dominance.
Probably not. Do they really believe they are going to knock OpenAI out of business, when the OpenAI models are better? Instead I think they are going after the "Android model". Recognize they might not be able to dethrone the leader who invented the space. Define yourself in the marketplace as the cheaper alternative. "Less good but almost as good." In the end, they hope to be one of a small number of surviving memb…
Gemini is substantially cheaper to run (in consumer prices, and likely internally as well) than OpenAI's models. You might wonder, what's the value in this, if the model isn't leading? But cheaper inference could potentially be a killer edge when you can scale test-time compute for reasoning. Scaling test-time compute is, after all, what makes o1 so powerful. And this new Gemini doesn't expose that capability at all to the user, so it's comparing apples and oranges anyway.
DeepMind researchers have never been primarily about LLMs, but RL. If DM's (and OAI's) theory is correct--that you can use test-time compute to generate better results, and train on that--this is potentially a substantial edge for Google.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Probably not. Do they really believe they are going to knock OpenAI out of business, when the OpenAI models are better? Instead I think they are going after the "Android model". Recognize they might not be able to dethrone the leader who invented the space. Define yourself in the marketplace as the cheaper alternative. "Less good but almost as good." In the end, they hope to be one of a small number of surviving memb…
The latest Google Pixel phone (you know, the one that Google actually set the price for) appears to cost the exact same as the latest iPhone ($999 for pro, $799 for non-pro). And I would argue against the "less good" bit too. I think this analysis is not in keeping with reality, and I doubt if that's their strategy.
Google should just offer llama3 405b, maybe slightly fine tuned. Geminis are unusable.
Has anyone used Gemini Code Assist? I'm curious how it compares with Github Copilot and Cursor.
I use it and find it very helpful. Never tried cursor or copilot though