Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm just curious about why you need to run it in a terminal? I have a linux machine at work and use a MacBook for remote work. When I'm remote I just run Sublime locally on my Mac and set up an sshfs mount to my workstation for the source files. Works like a charm. Note - not at all saying you're doing it wrong :-) just curious if you'd tried this kind of setup and why it didn't work for you?
It's mainly to keep everything (where everything == files, REPL, docs, etc.) in a single window, which I can then throw full-screen and have absolutely nothing but my work in front of me. I'm sure one could use ST2 (or any other GUI app) on Linux with a tiling WM like xmonad and achieve a similar workflow, but there doesn't seem to be a way to achieve this on OSX that doesn't involve ugly/unstable hacks.
Sublime Text 2.0 Released
81–90 of 358 posts
Re: Sublime Text 2.0 Released
#82Based on the great reviews of ST2, I switched from vim to ST2 (with vintage mode) a few months ago. It seems good... but it hasn't lived up to the reviews for me. I'm guessing I'm missing some of the functionality. Is there a tutorial anywhere to show me what I'm missing? How have you learned about ST2 features (rather than just repeating your old editing habits in a new program)?
Re: Sublime Text 2.0 Released
#83Earlier quoted context omitted.
Have you ever watched somebody proficient with Vim or Emac, who has spent years crafting the perfect .vimrc for themselves? You'd get it if you did.
And why would I want to spend years crafting the perfect .vimrc for myself when tools exist that already do 80% of that better and without any configuration? I say this with a carefully crafted and organized .vim folder.
Re: Sublime Text 2.0 Released
#84Re: Sublime Text 2.0 Released
#85As an Intellij user (and Emacs way before that) I'm trying to give this a chance, but I see no way to click-navigate through source code. Am I missing something? I tried installing SublimeCodeIntel, and that lets me (occasionally) navigate to symbols in the current file. But I don't seem to be able to click through to symbols defined in other files/classes. Am I missing something fundamental, or is this strictly the…
Found a ctags module. https://github.com/SublimeText/CTags
Re: Sublime Text 2.0 Released
#86Now that it's official, I hope that the documentation gets the attention it needs. Congrats!
I'm trying to improve this by writing an ebook about Sublime Text 2. If you're interested, here is the first chapter: http://cl.ly/0N0X1j401o22353m2V2V
I'd also love to see a "cheat-sheet" for shortcut keys.
Re: Sublime Text 2.0 Released
#87Re: Sublime Text 2.0 Released
#88Based on the great reviews of ST2, I switched from vim to ST2 (with vintage mode) a few months ago. It seems good... but it hasn't lived up to the reviews for me. I'm guessing I'm missing some of the functionality. Is there a tutorial anywhere to show me what I'm missing? How have you learned about ST2 features (rather than just repeating your old editing habits in a new program)?
Re: Sublime Text 2.0 Released
#89I've reverted back to Vim (not really ST2's fault, just that it doesn't run in a terminal and I've gotten addicted to split-panes in iTerm), but ST2's a solid editor. Definitely worth your $60. PS: If it got even a basic terminal... EDIT2: ST2 does have split panes, I just can't run a terminal in them.
I'm just curious about why you need to run it in a terminal? I have a linux machine at work and use a MacBook for remote work. When I'm remote I just run Sublime locally on my Mac and set up an sshfs mount to my workstation for the source files. Works like a charm. Note - not at all saying you're doing it wrong :-) just curious if you'd tried this kind of setup and why it didn't work for you?
An editor that can't work in a screen session is simply a non-starter for me, especially as there's pretty much no _benefit_ in a GUI for any of the text editors I've tried.
Re: Sublime Text 2.0 Released
#90Earlier quoted context omitted.
Have you ever watched somebody proficient with Vim or Emac, who has spent years crafting the perfect .vimrc for themselves? You'd get it if you did.
And why would I want to spend years crafting the perfect .vimrc for myself when tools exist that already do 80% of that better and without any configuration? I say this with a carefully crafted and organized .vim folder.
And I have an .emacs.d folder carefully crafted over 20 years.