Are We Now Living in a Parasite Culture?
honest-broker.com
Are We Now Living in a Parasite Culture?
1–10 of 19 posts
Re: Are We Now Living in a Parasite Culture?
#2The value of content distribution platforms is thus in logistics: getting the right content to the right people. And on the other hand, people aren’t willing to pay a lot for this.
I think the bigger example of parasite culture comes in the form of individuals. People whose jobs largely work to support the office politicians and their campaigns (HR departments, mid-level managers, etc.)
Then there are actual politicians, each of whom need large staffs to do the work they’ve been hired to do because the processes have been made complex enough to justify the jobs of their staffers. Or the people who think it’s okay to spend a billion dollars on a software platform for public education. Or the people who charge a billion dollars for a public education platform.
The examples are everywhere these days when you look around. It’s hard to find organizations that actively weed out this behaviour. Does anyone have an example of an organization that has bucked this trend?
Re: Are We Now Living in a Parasite Culture?
#3We know exactly how much money the end user is paying for these, and so unlike the tik-tok video with 800k views we can easily understand their value. We also know Apple/Google are taking is 30% of that value.
It's not just individual creators on social media that are suffering from this but also large companies.
Re: Are We Now Living in a Parasite Culture?
#4Re: Are We Now Living in a Parasite Culture?
#5Re: Are We Now Living in a Parasite Culture?
#6But in the case of social media, people get paid not only in money but also with attention and status ('likes'). Actually, the vast majority of users aren't getting paid any money. But we're social creatures, and we'll do almost anything for status and attention.
Re: Are We Now Living in a Parasite Culture?
#7I think the most obvious examples of this are the Apple and Android app stores. We know exactly how much money the end user is paying for these, and so unlike the tik-tok video with 800k views we can easily understand their value. We also know Apple/Google are taking is 30% of that value. It's not just individual creators on social media that are suffering from this but also large companies.
App stores are the largest marketplaces. Instead of taking a cut from levels produced for a game, articles published on a website, videos published on YouTube, or plugins developed for some enterprise software, they take a cut from all applications developed for a platform. But the principle is the same.
The problem here is not taking the cut, per se, but rather the oligopoly. If we had dozens of app stores, with easy switching for users, the developers would move to less abusive ones. Maintaining the infrastructure costs some money, so taking maybe 5% would be appropriate. Or maybe taking 10% and providing excellent development tools in return.
With websites that monetize articles, I don't mind that they take a cut, because I can easily move away from them if I decide that they take too much and it would be cheaper to host everything myself, and maybe pay someone to move the articles from the old place to the new one. Moving articles is simple, it's just text and pictures, and maybe some formatting gets lost in the process.
With Apple and Android, there are no other places to move, and the applications would need a rewrite. Which is why they have greater leverage.
The problem is not taking a cut (what the author refers to as parasitism). Infrastructure costs something; how else do you imagine it would be paid for? The problem is the lack of choice.
Re: Are We Now Living in a Parasite Culture?
#8Re: Are We Now Living in a Parasite Culture?
#9Re: Are We Now Living in a Parasite Culture?
#10These services aren't parasites. Theory of the firm, spontaneous organization, systems tend to the lowest energy state, all that, things settled into the current arrangement because it is superior than the previous arrangement. These companies built things that connect people who create more often than they consume with people who consume more often than they create, and they middleman it, make it easier for everyone around to get what they want and take their worth.
They're beginning to deliberately become monopolies, control access to distribution, this is parasitic in some sense, but it is sub optimal and eventually ripe for disruption.
What I thought he was talking about was how people these days seem to always be looking for a way to get one over on someone else. It seems there's a culture of "the only way to get ahead is at someone else's expense" and most business models are about where to find that someone and how to swindle him. I went to a consultation with a surgeon to see if an old surgery was still in good shape, his only motivation was to try to find a way to get me to agree to another surgery regardless if I needed it. I talked to my friend who is in the medical industry and he said "of course he's trying to sell surgery, hes a surgeon." It's a given that people will try to swindle you, even if that means butchering your body. That's what I think when I hear the term "parasite culture."