Live data from Hacker News

We know what you're doing

weknowwhatyouredoing.com

71–80 of 121 posts

Re: We know what you're doing

#71

Reading the comments I understand that it grabs public facebook data if you are logged, right ? Since I am currently logged and can't see any of my data it means that my facebook profile isn't public (or at least the data this page fetches aren't public) ?

No. I viewed this on a browser where I'm not logged into Facebook.

Re: We know what you're doing

#72
post #50
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's because you're being redirected back to your profile since the URL the parent posted is incorrect.

yeah, but why doesn't it respond with 404 as would be appropriate?

Most web sites don't 404 when fed unrecognized get params.

Re: We know what you're doing

#73
post #58
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is a neat trick and reminds me of MCI codes from the BBS days. Basically, for a lot of BBS software (and usually enabled by default) visitors to your BBS when posting in discussion threads could insert escape characters (like "%UN") which at runtime would be replaced with metadata related to the person viewing the post at that time. So, if I were to post "%UN's mother was a hamster and father smelled of elderber…

My favorite BBS hack was that on some standard RA configs, unless explicitly turned off by the sysop, you could save received messages to disk even if you were just a normal user. This meant that you could send a message to yourself, i.e. 'del . /q /s' (or whatever zapped your dos disk, I can't really remember.), and then save it to 'c:\autoexec.bat' ... Other fun things where nailbombs, small .zip files that would e…

Kids these days improved on the old pranks: http://research.swtch.com/zip

Re: We know what you're doing

#74
post #16

I can't believe people are still publicly posting stuff about their bosses. Surely there has been enough press coverage about people getting fired for fb/twitter antics

> I can't believe people are still publicly posting stuff about their bosses.

It's a free world. People should be allowed to say whatever they want on whatever medium they want (as long as it's not hate-speech etc.)

Re: We know what you're doing

#75
post #68

This could have been done a little more sophisticated. Now it seems nothing more than some basic text searches. For instance two people saying "Not Hungover AT ALL, I love these mornings" and "Hungover !" respectively are both in the hungover section. And in the doing drugs section there was one guy who was happy he actually quit.

That's a nontrivial problem to solve. Consider "I avoided becoming hungover again!". In other words, you'd have to do a full semantic analysis and get the scope of negations right. I hear that current sentiment analysis techniques use a heuristic by looking for a nearby negation.

Re: We know what you're doing

#76

Reading the comments I understand that it grabs public facebook data if you are logged, right ? Since I am currently logged and can't see any of my data it means that my facebook profile isn't public (or at least the data this page fetches aren't public) ?

No. I viewed this on a browser where I'm not logged into Facebook.

Well I think I am totally missing the point then.

The page doesn't display any info/statuses related to my fb profile or any of my fb friends. From my point of view it is just displaying random fb results obtained by keyword related searches performed against the fb public data accessible via fb API. As far as I am concerned and aware of nothing in my profile is public.

Re: We know what you're doing

#77

A great example that should remind people that it's probably best to assume that everything they say or do online (offline as well) is now (and forevermore) public. Assume that anything you say or do has the ability to be seen by anyone and everyone around the globe instantly - without any methods of recourse. The genie is out of the bottle. Hence one should adapt one's own behaviour and act accordingly (that doesn't…

It doesn't have to be that way; it's very easy to lock down your facebook settings to friends-only. I think it's quite ridiculous that that's not the default. This pessimistic assumption you mention where anyone can see everything might be the safest, but it's just not how humans work. When you're surrounded by a bunch of friends (or their status messages), you don't assume the rest of the world is overhearing you as well.

Re: We know what you're doing

#78
I think most have missed the point of the massive upside of aggregating Facebook data. Sure the initial experiment may have selected some low value categories, however the site shows the technology works. Is anyone here using twitter or Facebook data for commercial purposes?

Re: We know what you're doing

#79
post #74
post #16

I can't believe people are still publicly posting stuff about their bosses. Surely there has been enough press coverage about people getting fired for fb/twitter antics

> I can't believe people are still publicly posting stuff about their bosses. It's a free world. People should be allowed to say whatever they want on whatever medium they want (as long as it's not hate-speech etc.)

It's also free in that the boss can fire you if he feels like it in many places.

Re: We know what you're doing

#80
post #58
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is a neat trick and reminds me of MCI codes from the BBS days. Basically, for a lot of BBS software (and usually enabled by default) visitors to your BBS when posting in discussion threads could insert escape characters (like "%UN") which at runtime would be replaced with metadata related to the person viewing the post at that time. So, if I were to post "%UN's mother was a hamster and father smelled of elderber…

My favorite BBS hack was that on some standard RA configs, unless explicitly turned off by the sysop, you could save received messages to disk even if you were just a normal user. This meant that you could send a message to yourself, i.e. 'del . /q /s' (or whatever zapped your dos disk, I can't really remember.), and then save it to 'c:\autoexec.bat' ... Other fun things where nailbombs, small .zip files that would e…

Something like this?

http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=259458

Post reply on HN