Live data from Hacker News

Orbitz shows costlier hotel options to Mac users

online.wsj.com

31–40 of 145 posts

Re: Orbitz shows costlier hotel options to Mac users

#31
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you're running AdBlock you won't see the "click here to subscribe now!" pitch. The ellipses isn't the end of the article!

Maybe paywall sites should be banned from HN.

Maybe best just to clearly disclose it somehow. I know it's not apples with apples, but should we ban patio11's potential $5 comprehensive ebook because it's not free or behind an email registration? Or (apples with a non-fruit) 'Show HN' efforts that are paid services?

Re: Orbitz shows costlier hotel options to Mac users

#32
post #7

Are they simply showing pricier offers, or are they showing the exact same offers but with the prices raised? The former is annoying but not inherently evil, but the latter would be terrible.

The article title is far less ambiguous than the HN title: "On Orbitz, Mac Users Steered to Pricier Hotels"

Re: Orbitz shows costlier hotel options to Mac users

#34
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In Econ, the latter is called differential pricing and there is nothing evil about it at all. http://www.pricingforprofit.com/pricing-explained/differenti...

It't NOT differential pricing, that would be offering the same product top Mac users for more money. They are instead offerent more expensive hotels to Mac users - on the reasonable assumption that Mac owners are higher spenders compared to somebody connecting from a free PC in a public library.

I presume you were downvoted because the responder specifically referred to the "latter" description: "or are they showing the exact same offers but with the prices raised".

Re: Orbitz shows costlier hotel options to Mac users

#35
post #8

I also find this fascinating. As someone involved in creating recommendation systems for web sites based on various user behavior signals, I can see adding a "what type of browser do they use" and "what type of OS do they use" intelligence in the future to further segment users. Mac ownership must be a proxy for "household income". Brilliant.

Would be easy enough to compare prices on windows/linux in a vm on my mac though. And take note of the companies that do it. Something else to add to comparison services as well, aka does site xyz.com discriminate based on os/browser?

Re: Orbitz shows costlier hotel options to Mac users

#36
post #35
post #8

I also find this fascinating. As someone involved in creating recommendation systems for web sites based on various user behavior signals, I can see adding a "what type of browser do they use" and "what type of OS do they use" intelligence in the future to further segment users. Mac ownership must be a proxy for "household income". Brilliant.

Would be easy enough to compare prices on windows/linux in a vm on my mac though. And take note of the companies that do it. Something else to add to comparison services as well, aka does site xyz.com discriminate based on os/browser?

Much easier to use an user agent switcher plugin while in incognito mode.

Re: Orbitz shows costlier hotel options to Mac users

#38
post #8

I also find this fascinating. As someone involved in creating recommendation systems for web sites based on various user behavior signals, I can see adding a "what type of browser do they use" and "what type of OS do they use" intelligence in the future to further segment users. Mac ownership must be a proxy for "household income". Brilliant.

Seems reasonable - next time you are at the dentist check out the Yachting and golf magazines. They aren't advertizing Timex on the back cover.

[deleted]

Re: Orbitz shows costlier hotel options to Mac users

#40
post #8

I also find this fascinating. As someone involved in creating recommendation systems for web sites based on various user behavior signals, I can see adding a "what type of browser do they use" and "what type of OS do they use" intelligence in the future to further segment users. Mac ownership must be a proxy for "household income". Brilliant.

It's a demographic like any other, even if only aspirational.
Post reply on HN