Live data from Hacker News

Pivotal Tracker will shut down

pivotaltracker.com

41–50 of 271 posts

Re: Pivotal Tracker will shut down

#41
That's too bad. At one of my companies they were using Trello for all engineering development which I found just too casual of an approach. Jira would have been overkill.

Pivotal provided a nice middle ground and was so easy to use with just the right amount of customization and power user functionality.

But I always felt like there was a small group of users and it just never got a foothold in companies.

Re: Pivotal Tracker will shut down

#43
Are there any open source self-hostable tracking/project management tools that still have a committed team and forward momentum?

I used to self-host a Phabricator instance, which I liked a lot, but the upstream maintainer made the reasonable decision to step away.

My guess is there is not much of a niche for self-hosted solutions anymore. The GitHub Issues free tier covers most of the low-complexity use-cases, while higher-complexity use-cases are addressed by enterprise SaaS.

Re: Pivotal Tracker will shut down

#44
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Looks like it, that's new! I tried Linear quite some time ago and it didn't "stick", I'll have to give it another shot. Thanks for the tip!

Linear is the best project management for software I've ever used, highly recommend. They've added many many amazing features this year... Incredible team over there that are just a joy to work with.

+1. Linear is a great PM tool, maybe even the best. What makes it awesome is their support team. I’ve been in touch with them a handful of times over the past ~5 years, and each time, they’ve been excellent — fast response times, with genuine and tech savvy people on the other side.

Re: Pivotal Tracker will shut down

#46
post #39
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Agreed, as an ex-pivot I really liked PT (relative to Jira et al.) It was clear the VMWare was going to gut the company, and Broadcom only made that clearer. It was once a great company... (Pivotal Labs) Now it's toast.

I have never understood the VMWare/Pivotal thing, to the point where I assumed there must be two different companies named that for VMWare to have bought a company called Pivotal.

It was a different company until 2019. And they were doing great stuff, but it all went down after the acquisition.

Re: Pivotal Tracker will shut down

#47
The thing that I always liked about Pivotal is that it was visibly obvious that there was only one queue.

It forced everyone to ruthlessly prioritize and make the hard decisions.

In this moment, do you want me working on this bug, or this new feature? You have to decide - you get one or the other.

It avoided the "Everything is a high priority" dilemma.

Re: Pivotal Tracker will shut down

#48

Are there any open source self-hostable tracking/project management tools that still have a committed team and forward momentum? I used to self-host a Phabricator instance, which I liked a lot, but the upstream maintainer made the reasonable decision to step away. My guess is there is not much of a niche for self-hosted solutions anymore. The GitHub Issues free tier covers most of the low-complexity use-cases, while…

https://we.phorge.it/ is a community fork that appears pretty active.

I was also very fond of Phabricator (all though my team preferred GitHub style pull requests) but I haven't had a need for it recently, so I haven't tried phorge myself.

Re: Pivotal Tracker will shut down

#49
post #9

Unfortunate. Of all the PM tools I've used, I hated Pivotal the least. It made it easy to do the things that were frequently done. It limited customization down to a sane level. And it generally seemed to stay out of the way (significant look at Jira).

Agreed, and I suspect part of what made it great is that it was being ignored. I love all the dubious new features it doesn't have, and the complex larger platform offering it isn't a part of.

Re: Pivotal Tracker will shut down

#50
post #47

The thing that I always liked about Pivotal is that it was visibly obvious that there was only one queue. It forced everyone to ruthlessly prioritize and make the hard decisions. In this moment, do you want me working on this bug, or this new feature? You have to decide - you get one or the other. It avoided the "Everything is a high priority" dilemma.

+1. It's been 15 years since I used Tracker but I miss that aspect of it.
Post reply on HN