81–90 of 132 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
My current hypothesis is that it's an individual moderator (perhaps showing off) running a script without official sanction, hence the silence from the admins. The way the post on the subject[0] was buried without official comment after over 500 upvotes suggests a certain amount of institutional blindness. [0] http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4102013
I think PG did comment on a subsequent post asking why post on subject[0] was taken down. I am not sure if commenting on a soon-to-be-killed post constitutes an official comment though, perhaps it was decided there is no need since according to policy meta-concerns should be dealt with using email.
Nice color scheme. Anyone know of a similar theme for emacs?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
So it's looking for Chrome, a closed source browser that I'd never use, instead of Chromium. Too bad.
Seems like you can use any browser you'd like by going to: http://localhost:8833/ once the server is up and running.
For example: (.. System (getProperties)) produces a lot of output, and I'd like to look through it to find a property.
Maybe a way to expand the output (like chrome inspector's javascript objects) ?
That said, it's pretty cool, and really interesting.
Btw, I was wondering if Dr. Racket's style of automatic parens-closing by just repeatedly pressing ']' (regardless of '(','{','[') makes anyone else wish other editors supported that feature.
Java being required means this is a complete non-starter for me.
Do you have an ideological or practical opposition? Java is cross-platform enough for it not to be an issue. Are you memory-constrained?