Live data from Hacker News

macOS Sequoia is available today

apple.com

501–510 of 643 posts

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#501

looking forward to use userspace filesystems with fskit !

What does fskit do better than MacFUSE?

Apple is making if harder and harder to install kernel extensions and so requiring the macfuse dependency is becoming a big burden on your tool and thus that raises the barrier to entry for user space filesystems on mac

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#502

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That would kill a lot of old software, though. Especially games.

I challenge you to find old software that still runs on modern Macs which was never code signed. Note that support for 32-bit applications has been retired, and x86 applications will eventually be sunsetted as well. This isn't Windows.

Indeed, the current state of affairs on the Mac is the consequence of Apple repeatedly making this kind of choice. That doesn't make it any less frustrating when things that worked before, stop working after.

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#503

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Once you need to be in the apple developer program to build and run from source or something, that’ll be a legitimate nightmare. But we’re nowhere near that yet. When Quarantine was released in Leopard, and Gatekeeper in Lion, and System Integrity Protection in El Capitan, and then "Allow from Anywhere" was removed as an option in Sierra... Each time, people were saying similar things. "Yea, it's bad, and it's gett…

To me these are clear security improvements; things are not getting worse. And there is absolutely no reason to think they'll be dropping support for endusers running their own compiled software.

The obvious end point would be the same as iOS, which is to say - you can run it to your heart's content, provided that you shell out for a dev certificate.

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#504
post #159

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Setting the "Double-click a window's title bar" action to Zoom just fills the vertical space. It doesn't adjust the width to fill available space, which is usually what I want. Finder, as an example, almost never sets the width to something usable.

True, it would be more accurate to say that what "zoom" is designed to do is expand the window as much as possible to display all the content, however the application defines that. For many applications, the result is a fully maximized window. On my MBA, Notes, Messages, Calendar, iTerm, Solvspace, and Mail all just fill the screen. For other applications that report specific content area to the OS that can mean some…

The most annoying one is Safari, which arbitrarily decides on what the "best" window width is, even if the website could easily reflow to fit a wider window.

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#505
post #277

Earlier quoted context omitted.

interesting % /usr/bin/jq --version jq-1.6-159-apple-gcff5336-dirty

I can't know what "-dirty" implies, but https://github.com/jqlang/jq/commit/cff5336 is a pretty random commit from 2022 :-( https://github.com/apple-oss-distributions/distribution-macO... hasn't been updated with a "jq" directory yet

"dirty" usually means that the commit doesn't correspond to any specific version tag in the repo (or whatever other mechanism is used to map commits to versions).

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#506
post #377

nice, but still many things to be improved: - iphone mirroring keeps going into "paused" mode, showing a "resume" button - iphone mirroring doesn't unblock apps that need face Id, e.g. whatsapp says "passcode required" without prompting for some form of auth (auto auth is enabled, but no luck) - iphone mirroring is not really "mirroring": one cannot use both app and phone at the same time, and see what is going on. -…

For me the iOS apps that need FaceID pop up the fingerprint dialog on macOS.

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#507

Earlier quoted context omitted.

More importantly - it doesn't work on anything but apple hardware.

They have said it will work on Windows with iCloud desktop app installed. https://support.apple.com/en-au/guide/icloud-windows/icw7603...

It does indeed work on Windows.

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#508

Weird how the title says, "macOS Sequoia is available today, bringing iPhone Mirroring, Apple Intelligence, and more to Mac" Then you look at the paragraph for this and it says, "Coming Soon: Apple Intelligence" They announced this in June, and it's just loosely coming "this fall." I have a feeling they are finding it very difficult to do anything with any kind of consistency or value on their 8gb RAM phones / Macboo…

My understanding is that 8GB is plenty enough to play with small models (7B or so) in a lightly quantized version. (Especially since model params are kept on disk and only really "mapped" to RAM, with it acting as a cache.) 4GB is where it gets dicey, as you're constrained to tiny models that just don't do anything very interesting.

Thing is, you do need all the params usually, so if the model is only partially mapped to RAM, it's the equivalent of an app swapping in and out as it runs. Which is to say, it means that inference is much slower.

Local Apple models are likely in the 2-3B range, but fine-tuned to specific tasks.

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#509
post #11

Ubuntu is really good these days. If you bought into the apple ecosystem with a recent Mac I’d not bother. But for those of your running a PC Ubuntu is incredible and their new App Store makes finding and installing software super easy. My workstation pc with Ubuntu is insanely faster than my Mac Studio when it comes to jetbrains IDEs. It’s so snappy I first couldn’t believe the performance diff.

Last time I tried Linux on a brand new laptop - around six months ago - the battery life was about 20% less than in Windows on that same hardware.

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#510
post #492

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If any other laptop had a trackpad like apple, with multi touch and gesture support, I would switch.

Linux user for the past 20 years - I cannot remember the last laptop I had that didn't have multi touch and gestures support. been using mostly ThinkPads & Dells. I don't know what marketing team created this whole "our trackpad is so different" belief, but they've done a brilliant job!

Multi-touch per se has been pretty common even in tiny junk trackpads. The problem is that it's not particularly useful in that case.

What makes Apple's trackpads so nice is a huge and solid surface. I came from Thinkpads myself and honestly didn't expect that to be as much of a thing as it turned out to be, but yes, they really are that much better. There are a few PC laptops these days with similar trackpads, but you definitely have to look for it when picking one.

Post reply on HN