Live data from Hacker News

macOS Sequoia is available today

apple.com

471–480 of 643 posts

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#471
post #353

Ah yes, another year of “what will Apple break in my workflow this time” tradition. I can’t recall the last time I upgraded immediately. Maybe 2018? Been waiting for minor and patch releases of the bug ridden OS before upgrading myself (if personal device is eligible)

[deleted]

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#473
post #455

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's both on my Mac Mini and my MBA (both M1). It work great on the Mini. I think bluetooth work, but I have no use for it and have never checked. Everything works great as far as I know (even virtualization with qemu). I don't game on it, so can't say anything about that. As for the MBA, suspend is still a miss (I read that the asahi team can't get certain devices to go to deep sleep, so they chose a safer low power…

Personally if I'm going Linux, I'm out on Mac hardware. Don't get me wrong, Mac hardware is nice hardware. But there's no reason to own it if you're using alternative operating systems. The bang for your buck on computing is wildly better on something like a Beelink mini PC than a Mac Mini. Windows laptop hardware has also most definitely caught up to the M1. And I think we all know you listed off everything that's g…

Yeah, the macs were all I had, so there was no other option. I'm waiting for my new PCs to arrive and once they get here, I'm going to wipe the Asahi installation and revert to stock macOS (I will still need them as work computers and for XCode)

And I genuinely don't use Bluetooth. Everything is wired, although I use WiFi on the MBA. Neither do I like to use the laptop microphone (noisy environment, so I use a headset or the usb microphone). The only thing I care in a laptop is WiFi, a good enough keyboard, a good enough screen, low temperature and noise, and a battery that last at least 4 hours. My default workstation is the desktop.

But yeah, I do agree with you that it's better to go with PC if you're planning to stick with Linux long term.

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#474

Best new feature: Passwords are a separate app again instead of being a shitty, illegible panel in the inexplicably-unresizable, cramped, tiny-text hell of the iOSified system prefs. Maybe in a couple more major versions we'll have a re-re-designed system prefs app that actually looks like a desktop app again!

I continue to be baffled by why there is a "General" section in Settings on macOS and iOS. Uhhhh, stuff.

I have never understood this.

Trying to guess if I should look for something in the root level of Settings or in the General subsection?

Absolutely no rhyme or reason as far as I can tell.

It's why I just use search for settings now. I refuse to keep guessing wrong.

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#475
post #172
post #75

Although I don’t use MacOS, the fact that you can now control an iPhone from a Mac will probably be reverse engineered to allow Linux to do the same at some point. A lot of automation opportunities

"Available on Mac computers with Apple silicon and Intel-based Mac computers with a T2 Security Chip. Requires that your iPhone and Mac are signed in with the same Apple ID using two-factor authentication" https://www.apple.com/macos/macos-sequoia/

Ah that sucks. No wonder it isn’t available in the EU

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#476

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One huge step closer to iOS. Damn it. I actually liked macOS but these changes are terrible for everyone but the most basic users.

Really? This is _huge_ to you? How many unsigned apps are you downloading and running? This is one of those features where the benefits seem to very obviously outweigh the drawbacks. 99.9% of users just aren't running unsigned software, so the moment that happens, it is most certainly malware. If you're developing software yourself, this isn't an issue either, since all the relevant toolchains, debuggers, etc., work…

> How many unsigned apps are you downloading and running?

Enough for this to be annoying. Plenty of tiny tools don't pay for the privilege of doing free work, so aren't signed

> This is one of those features where the benefits seem to very obviously outweigh the drawbacks. 99.9% of users just aren't running unsigned software, so the moment that happens, it is most certainly malware.

You're obviously wrong with your made up stats (you don't need to be a power '1% user to want to install some a single useful unsigned app over the whole lifetime of using a Mac) and ignore the fact that part of the reason why it's 99% and not 88% is precisely because of features like this that make it harder to do so.

But there is an easy way to reconcile - make the old behavior configurable then the imaginary nonexisting 0.0000% users can continue without permanent disruptions

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#477

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Phones nowadays are made to last years, even 6+ years easily. So the update this year is not for the people who bought it last year but for people with an iPhone X or 11. They will see major improvements. But it’s silly to update (any) flagship phone every year.

Okay, but then, why upgrade to a 16 Pro instead of the much cheaper 15 Pro? The price difference applies there too — there needs to be some reason to get the newest, most expensive one. This generation it is not hardware.

Well this applies to everything then. Why buy the latest AMD or Intel CPU or Nvidia GPU ? Some people upgrade from iPhone X to 15 this year because it’s cheaper. Some have an old iPhone and just want the latest model to go for 6 or 7 more years. Even incremental upgrades like this year are welcome. Before there was an S model every other year. This year it’s the « iPhone 15S pro ». Slightly better and more powerful. The other thing is, I think it’s pretty hard to say « well last year model was good enough, we’ll go on a 2 year cycle this time ». It could send the wrong message to investors so they’re trapped in the race maybe ?

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#478
post #121

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> "the last 5% is an open research problem". That is the biggest hurdle, in my opinion. If we could even reply with, "sorry, I don't know about that", it would be such an improvement over what we have today. Sadly, from what I understand, the only way to say "sorry, I don't know about that" is to just say that to every single question?

There's no specific reason why LLMs couldn't be trained to say "Don't know" when they don't know. Indeed, some close examination shows separate calculation patterns when it's telling the truth, when it's making a mistake and when it's deliberately bullshitting, with the latter being painfully common. The problem is we don't train them that way. They're trained on what data is on the internet, and people... people rea…

> There's no specific reason why LLMs couldn't be trained to say "Don't know" when they don't know.

Yes there is, it's that we don't know how. We don't have anywhere close to the level of understanding to know when an LLM knows something and when it doesn't.

Training on material that includes "I don't know" will not work. That's not the solution.

If we knew how, we'd be doing it, since that's the #1 user complaint, and the company that fixed it would win.

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#479

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Once you need to be in the apple developer program to build and run from source or something, that’ll be a legitimate nightmare. But we’re nowhere near that yet. This is the case for building and running things with restricted entitlements and system extensions. Unless you disable system integrity protection entirely, which locks you out of your purchased App Store software, DRM content, etc.

You can no longer disable system integrity protection.

You can [1].

[1]: https://www.reddit.com/r/hackintosh/comments/1fh5wez/cant_di...

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#480

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hm, I've been really happy with Rectangle ( https://rectangleapp.com ) and its shortcuts have become second nature to me, but if the native version is equally keyboard friendly I might give it a go. (btw, have you tried Rectangle and if so - what didn't you like?) (Not affiliated with it, just a happy user)

I use the "Multitouch" app from the same developer which integrates Rectangle with some other things. Trying out the new macOS version.. it's a little fiddly to activate sometimes didn't want to go. Then the margin/spacing between the edge of the screens was annoying. Though I discovered that there is an option under "Desktop & Dock" in settings you can turn off called "Tiled windows have margins". What I haven't fig…

I can't believe I have not had the curiosity to lookup the devs' other apps. Thank you.
Post reply on HN