Live data from Hacker News

macOS Sequoia is available today

apple.com

321–330 of 643 posts

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#321
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

I already own two 2560x1440 non-Apple displays that work flawlessly with my Windows PC, they cost $250 apiece, and there is absolutely no way in hell I am selling them and buying a $1599 display because Apple can't fix their egregiously bad software. I'll just live with slightly blurry icons whenever I want to use them with my Mac.

There are non-Apple options for FAR less.

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#323

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> supporting interoperability for these protocols is a burden Also an unprecedented and unacceptable privacy and security risk. You would be allowing third parties the ability to continuously record your iPhone's screen. Which includes websites you browse, apps you open, health information, text messages etc. And the Mac is so much open that you could do this, have a local model to transcribe it and ship it to a remo…

It is sad to see such a misinformed take on a technical forum. You can already do everything you want. It will take some reverse-engineering work, but it's possible. Similar things were said about iMessage interoperability with Android, until Beeper proved them wrong. They managed to reverse-engineer it, build a compatible client and clearly proved Apple's claims were BS (and no, this didn't lead to a mass-scale comp…

> the reverse-engineering requirement would become an insignificant hurdle compared to the value of such a vulnerability

The idea that breaking device attestation that is secured through Secure Enclave hardware i.e. not accessible from user code is an insignificant hurdle is hilariously ridiculous. It is borderline impossible for any ordinary developer.

And people that bring up the "just ask the user" argument clearly don't remember how poorly that has worked in the past e.g. Microsoft Vista. Users will blindly approve any dialog which is why Apple has been so careful to limit them to targeted actions which a "do you approve this app to record everything on your iPhone" is not.

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#324

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The way it's even implemented now is like the nightmare realized from everything Richard Stallman warned about for decades. Especially for non-technical users, they've practically implemented a system where Apple decides what software you are and aren't allowed to run on your own computer. They can muddy the issue by claiming it's for safety/security but I don't buy it. They could have made the override still clear b…

> They could have made the override still clear but much easier to access. The level of difficulty is absolutely intentional. For you, it's a small speed bump. For the guy on the phone with my grandma trying to hack her computer, it's more of a hill to climb.

Grandma probably needs an iPad.

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#325
post #68

For the first time Apple responded to my bug report through the Feedback Assistant and requested more information, so kind of feel involved in this :) So the bug was about the screen recording permission needed for some apps, Shottr specifically. Despite me allowing screen recording previously macOS Sequoia kept asking me to go into the settings and give the permission. According to Apple, that should have had happen…

Perhaps they could've done something like...

    sudo tccutil disable_monthly_screen_recording_prompt [bundle_id]
tccutil(1) is already a thing, which by its name you'd think would give you full CLI control over the macOS permission system (TCC), but strangely it only has one command as of now: "reset" (in Sonoma at least, haven't checked Sequoia yet).

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#326
post #300

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We're getting closer to the bottom of the slope! I wonder what their next step will be. 1. Need to disable gatekeeper to run unsigned code. 2. Need an active developer account. 3. You can't run downloaded unsigned code.

That's when I think about jumping ship. If they require the App Store that's the end.

If you zoom out and look at the trajectory release after release, all of these things are obviously coming. Every release we act surprised that it's slightly more difficult to run unsigned, un-notarized, un-sanctioned code, but somehow that Voice Of The Fanboy within us has us convinced that "surely this last change is where Apple will draw the line and stop!"

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#327
post #321

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I already own two 2560x1440 non-Apple displays that work flawlessly with my Windows PC, they cost $250 apiece, and there is absolutely no way in hell I am selling them and buying a $1599 display because Apple can't fix their egregiously bad software. I'll just live with slightly blurry icons whenever I want to use them with my Mac.

There are non-Apple options for FAR less.

Yes, but these are the ones I already own and that’s also completely besides the point, which is that they look great on Ubuntu, Windows 10/11, and pretty much every OS that’s not macOS

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#328

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Screen recording breaks remote access apps

There's a separate entitlement used for remote access software without the repeated prompts (com.apple.developer.persistent-content-capture), so you basically need Apple's permission to build that category of software now, and open source remote access software is not possible. So the category of software will still have some working entries (existing players will try to get approved, and probably will), but it's har…

[deleted]

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#329
post #57

Here’s one for HN readers, you can now find jq in /usr/bin/ in Sequoia.

Is it the BSD jq from 1995? Jk, thanks for the info! It's nice to know it's available on the system by default when writing scripts for my team.

Nah just the last GPL2 licensed version from 2008

ope wait that's just bash

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#330

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have an M1 Air 8GB and a 2018 MBP 16GB. Performance feels about the same until the Air hits swap, then the old Intel MBP still outperforms the M1 Air.

One you could probably fry bacon on whilst the battery drains in an hour...

I also get great battery life on older intel macbooks (2012 Pro w/Matte Screen 16/GB/4TB SATA + 2015 Air w/2TB NVME).

Feels good knowing when my storage wears out, i don't lose the whole machine.

Post reply on HN