Live data from Hacker News

macOS Sequoia is available today

apple.com

311–320 of 643 posts

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#311

Best new feature: Passwords are a separate app again instead of being a shitty, illegible panel in the inexplicably-unresizable, cramped, tiny-text hell of the iOSified system prefs. Maybe in a couple more major versions we'll have a re-re-designed system prefs app that actually looks like a desktop app again!

"Again"?

They were previously in "Keychain Access," which was primarily an app for administrators so it was also a pretty bad UX.

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#312

Best new feature: Passwords are a separate app again instead of being a shitty, illegible panel in the inexplicably-unresizable, cramped, tiny-text hell of the iOSified system prefs. Maybe in a couple more major versions we'll have a re-re-designed system prefs app that actually looks like a desktop app again!

How did they F that up so badly

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#313

Well, 1Password must be feeling pretty sour about how Apple Passwords app is a complete 1:1 clone. They don’t do licenses, credit cards or ssh keys yet so we probably won’t switch… yet

The second sentence invalidates your first - there's a lot of things it doesn't do compared to 1Password.

However it also doesn't randomly crash or simply refuse to autofill in Safari, so, I already switched.

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#314
post #126

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Genuine q: is cmd–backspace too much? I’m in general pretty satisfied with the Finder keyboard navigation/editing. Especially with “enter” for rename, copy/paste/cut/move and deletion too…

Yes, it is too much. I've spent 20 years deleting by pressing one button. Why require two?

The macOS behavior has been the way it is for I believe 30 years, perhaps longer. Im not sure where your expectation of changing this comes from.

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#315

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Most people interact with apps like Health on their phone not their Mac. And there are also many third party apps that never made Mac versions. So the amount of data we are talking about exposing is significantly higher. And the issue is that the DMA is ambiguous about what competition and interoperability specifically means and so it would just take one company to complain about your solution for Apple to be fined 1…

Many people log into their Mac using the same credentials (Apple ID) that give access to the Health data, and in fact Apple makes it really hard or even impossible to use it without (you can't selectively grant access, you need to use a separate Apple ID but then you lose some useful features such as universal clipboard, etc). This is again a misinformed take. Your Mac can already get all your iPhone's data from the…

> Your Mac can already get all your iPhone's data from the cloud

Only if the data is available in iCloud and it is stored in files and it is not encrypted.

Otherwise data from apps like Instagram will be exposed exclusively via screen sharing.

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#316
post #219

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Apple locking down the OS even more by making Gatekeeper harder to bypass makes me want to skip this version for as long as possible. The screen recording permission thing also doesn't help since I'm using Ice ( https://github.com/jordanbaird/Ice ) because somehow Apple still can't Sherlock this feature.

The way it's even implemented now is like the nightmare realized from everything Richard Stallman warned about for decades. Especially for non-technical users, they've practically implemented a system where Apple decides what software you are and aren't allowed to run on your own computer. They can muddy the issue by claiming it's for safety/security but I don't buy it. They could have made the override still clear b…

> They could have made the override still clear but much easier to access.

The level of difficulty is absolutely intentional. For you, it's a small speed bump. For the guy on the phone with my grandma trying to hack her computer, it's more of a hill to climb.

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#317

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, it is too much. I've spent 20 years deleting by pressing one button. Why require two?

The macOS behavior has been the way it is for I believe 30 years, perhaps longer. Im not sure where your expectation of changing this comes from.

Who said I expected macOS to change?

I am not changing, so that's why I install an additional app.

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#318
post #5

I am usually slow to upgrade but I jumped on this and iOS 18 immediately because of "iPhone Mirroring". I've only had it for a few minutes, but it's really nice!

I was excited to use this, and confusingly it requires the attached phone to use the same Apple ID/iCloud account as the Mac!

This makes it practically useless for developers.

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#319
post #95

Honestly most of the time I download these, it's just to get new wallpapers The recent live wallpapers feature is really cool, hopefully they've added more

They did to tvOS. I’m not sure about macOS but it would be nice.

Update: they did!

Re: macOS Sequoia is available today

#320

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The right-click/control-click option for easily opening unsigned apps is no longer available. Users who want to open unsigned software will now need to go the long way around to do it: first, try to launch the app and dismiss the dialog box telling you that it can't be opened. Then, open Settings, go to the Privacy & Security screen, scroll all the way to the bottom to get to the Security section, and click the Ope…

at least it's still possible (and maybe more accessible) if not a bit more inconvenient. the ctrl-click thing was kinda a hidden feature.

Precisely the kind of hidden feature that makes it easy for power users to bypass the "rules" Apple imposes on the platform, while still making it highly likely every day users won't know how to bypass the rules meant to protect them.

More and more, I find that these sorts of "we know best" attitudes towards security utterly distasteful and the total opposite of empowering. Infantilizing, more like.

Post reply on HN