281–290 of 323 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not fair, market price of the data (for example Wikipedia) is zero, but the cost of what OpenAI is providing is billions.
What about ClosedAI's ignoring of people's requests to not scrape their data?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
99% of people don't care. Also, they are in some sense open, ChatGPT is openly available and they're capped-profit.
Far, far more than 1% of people care. Sure, they are open in one sense: for business. But in the tech world, "open" specifically means showing us how you got your final product. It means releasing source code rather than just binaries (even free binaries!), or sharing protocols and standards rather than keeping them proprietary (looking at you Apple and HDMI). It doesn't matter if anyone can use ChatGPT, that has not…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
It's not a matter of making points, it's at least a semester's worth of courses on causal analysis, animal intelligence, the scientific method, explanation. Causality isnt ordering. Take two contrary causal mechanisms (eg., filling a bathtube with a hose, and emptying it with a bucket). The level of the bath is arbitrarily orderable with respect to either of these mechanisms. cf. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collide…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
What percentage of people who use their products care? 1%? OpenAI is a brand, not a literal description of the company!
> OpenAI is a brand, not a literal description of the company! If the brand name is deeply contradictory to the business practices of the company, people will start making nasty puns and jokes, which can lead to serious reputation damages for the respective company.
https://xcancel.com/SmokeAwayyy/status/1834641370486915417
The worst responses are links to something the generalized you can't be bothered to summarize. Providing a link is fine, but don't expect us to do the work to figure out what you are trying to say via your link.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> OpenAI is a brand, not a literal description of the company! If the brand name is deeply contradictory to the business practices of the company, people will start making nasty puns and jokes, which can lead to serious reputation damages for the respective company.
I think generally zero business damage in name. Only a vocal minority like to cry about it.
A very vocal minority can often have quite some influence on the majority. See for example the Wikipedia article on "Minority influence":
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think generally zero business damage in name. Only a vocal minority like to cry about it.
> Only a vocal minority like to cry about it. A very vocal minority can often have quite some influence on the majority. See for example the Wikipedia article on "Minority influence": > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minority_influence
I abuse chatgpt for generating erotic content, I've been doing so since day 1 of public access. I've paid for dozens of accounts in the past before they removed phone verification in account creation... At any point now I have 4 accounts signed into 2 browsers public/private windows, so I can juggle the rate limit. I receive messages and warnings and do on by email every day... I have never seen that warning message,…
I can’t convince o1 to fall for the same. It checks and checks and checks that it’s hitting OpenAI policy guidelines and utterly neuters any response that’s even a bit spicy in tone. I’m sure they’ll recalibrate at some point, it’s pretty aggressive right now.
It's all just human arrogance in a centralized neural network. We are, despite all our glorious technology, just space monkeys who recently discovered fire.
We're now in the magic smoke age