Live data from Hacker News

Consent-O-Matic – automatically fills ubiquitous pop-ups with your preferences

consentomatic.au.dk

121–130 of 147 posts

Re: Consent-O-Matic – automatically fills ubiquitous pop-ups with your preferences

#121

Hopefully this is handled in the upcoming eprivacy regulation that intends to move the opt-in choices from individual websites to the browser: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52...

Are you sure? Can you tell me which part of the regulation tries to do that because I couldn't find it.

Re: Consent-O-Matic – automatically fills ubiquitous pop-ups with your preferences

#123
post #43

Brave simply hides these popups. Works pretty well.

It only works because no-one* is developing to Brave. If Chrome tried that, it would be reverse-engineered or otherwise worked-around.

Brave uses Easylist/uBO Cookies list. Everyone develops for it.

Re: Consent-O-Matic – automatically fills ubiquitous pop-ups with your preferences

#124

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It only works because no-one* is developing to Brave. If Chrome tried that, it would be reverse-engineered or otherwise worked-around.

Brave uses Easylist/uBO Cookies list. Everyone develops for it.

If that was true, then Easylist/uBO Cookies list wouldn't work, as the thing they're blocking would have been developed not to be blockable by those things.

Re: Consent-O-Matic – automatically fills ubiquitous pop-ups with your preferences

#125

'I still don't care about cookies' works on almsot every website I browse. This extension on the other hand used to work maybe on a third, don't know if it improved but I would suggest the first if you're fed up with the cookie popup.

Note "I don't care about cookies" and "I still don't care about cookies" will accept tracking if that's the easiest route to get rid of the popup, which is a significant difference to the extension in this topic.

Re: Consent-O-Matic – automatically fills ubiquitous pop-ups with your preferences

#126
post #70

Asking genuinely as I never experimented myself -- Does the Internet experience in general cripple if one rejects the cookies on all websites? Or there is very little loss of functionality? I often allow 'essential cookies'. Would go to 'reject all' if that works fine.

Generally, no. Despite the claims that "this will not cause you to see less ads", sometimes it even does cause you to see less ads as ad slots are less likely to fill if they have less user info. (Sometimes the opposite happens and you get the shittiest weight loss ads however). That said, I assume most people likely to use this extension already run an ad blocker.

Sometimes it breaks youtube/twitter embeds.

Re: Consent-O-Matic – automatically fills ubiquitous pop-ups with your preferences

#127

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In addition to being explicit, consent must also be informed in order to be valid under the GDPR. This is not a blanket understanding of "I may be tracked on the internet." but a specific "X information may be used by Y data processors for Z purposes." If somebody is not informed of X, Y, and Z prior to giving consent, then it doesn't count. A browser-wide preference from years ago is not informed consent. There is o…

> There is one and only one legal default under the GDPR: Do not track. This is immediately followed by every head of marketing (at least for US-based companies) asking "Okay, so how do we track those people?" I'm not saying this is right. But it is reality. We normalized for two decades marketing leadership having the expectation that they can track every interaction, and prying that data away has been painful, espe…

I agree, and that's why I try to avoid any prevarication on the point. Because the head of marketing will at some point ask developers to break the law. Treating privacy law as a grey area gives the marketers more room to pressure developers, and more room to throw developers under the bus afterward.

Re: Consent-O-Matic – automatically fills ubiquitous pop-ups with your preferences

#128
post #15
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is very hard to prevent exfiltration by code that is allowed to write to the DOM in today’s browsers. There is Content Security Policy (csp) which applies to the whole page and sometimes governs scripts injected by extensions but not the extensions themselves. I would love to see browsers add a chain-of-custody to scripts and DOM nodes, so it is easy to tell which nodes were added/touched by a script, and if a scr…

Add some sort of signing process and call this Secure DOM.

Browser DOM Security Mechanism.

Re: Consent-O-Matic – automatically fills ubiquitous pop-ups with your preferences

#129
post #125

'I still don't care about cookies' works on almsot every website I browse. This extension on the other hand used to work maybe on a third, don't know if it improved but I would suggest the first if you're fed up with the cookie popup.

Note "I don't care about cookies" and "I still don't care about cookies" will accept tracking if that's the easiest route to get rid of the popup, which is a significant difference to the extension in this topic.

I understand the shortcoming but to be fair, if a website owner wants to track you he can do it even without cookie. I appreciate the gdpr for many reasons but the cookie banner constant spam is not one of them, I believe people just want to get rid of it even if it means agreeing to everything.

Re: Consent-O-Matic – automatically fills ubiquitous pop-ups with your preferences

#130
post #66

With how aggressive websites are in shoving popups down our throats for every little random thing, we need an in-browser AI bot to get rid of them appropriately. It's leaking too. I got a popup on my keyboard on my phone yesterday, and literally thought "this is too much, I wish I was dead" (I'm doing fine, just an intrusive thought :). Time to dial it back in folks. It is unbearable.

Or a standard API whereby a user fills out their preferences once in their browser, and the websites ask the browser for this information.
Post reply on HN