ESPN AI recap of Alex Morgan’s final professional match fails to mention her
awfulannouncing.com
ESPN AI recap of Alex Morgan’s final professional match fails to mention her
1–10 of 169 posts
Re: ESPN AI recap of Alex Morgan’s final professional match fails to mention her
#2Re: ESPN AI recap of Alex Morgan’s final professional match fails to mention her
#3In their announcement of the service, ESPN made a point to note that “each AI-generated recap will be reviewed by a human editor to ensure quality and accuracy.” It’s unclear if the human editor failed to notice Morgan’s absence or also decided it was not worth mentioning.
"Blame the intern" has been the great scapegoat for the last hundred years.
Re: ESPN AI recap of Alex Morgan’s final professional match fails to mention her
#4Re: ESPN AI recap of Alex Morgan’s final professional match fails to mention her
#5Re: ESPN AI recap of Alex Morgan’s final professional match fails to mention her
#6The AI highlights cut off during a point, skip entire points or even sets. Not to mention they don't account for important events that happen between points, they might cut off exciting commentary/celebrations that happened after a point, and even the handshake at the end of the match.
Re: ESPN AI recap of Alex Morgan’s final professional match fails to mention her
#7Re: ESPN AI recap of Alex Morgan’s final professional match fails to mention her
#8Re: ESPN AI recap of Alex Morgan’s final professional match fails to mention her
#9However, they're almost always so general, or even elementary that anyone who would bother to read the article would already know that stuff would wonder why a sports writer would write it. There's zero need for them for the audience they will attract.
A few even have these hilarious "this report was is not intended to indicate X, but .." type paragraphs at the end.
You can almost imagine the prompts that brought them about.
Re: ESPN AI recap of Alex Morgan’s final professional match fails to mention her
#10It is and was mostly done for search ranking. The more seemingly applicable content, the better your SEO.
This situation has probably happened several times before AI but has gone unnoticed or noticed to little fanfare. It's more indicative of ESPN not having its finger to the pulse and ensuring that one of the copywriters manually updated this particular article. It's not too surprising to me. They've always been known to favour quantity over quality.
source: I worked as a developer on the tech side of a company with this kind of content