Live data from Hacker News

Why Don't Tech Companies Pay Their Engineers to Stay?

goethena.com

211–220 of 294 posts

Re: Why Don't Tech Companies Pay Their Engineers to Stay?

#211

The people running companies are mostly "professional managers" who see engineers as a fungible resource. If anything, tenure in the same role is mostly a negative signal. Why haven't you gamed the promotion system yet? Don't you want to grow into management or 'technical leadership' and spend your days in meetings? What is wrong with you?

I think the exceptions prove this rule. Bell Labs and Gore-Tex are broadly studied in business school as structures empowering technical staff to keep innovating. I believe your comment describes the case when the company is not expected to innovate.

Re: Why Don't Tech Companies Pay Their Engineers to Stay?

#212

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I make low six figures in a low to medium cost of living area. I don't think even doubling my income would change my life too much.

Money isn’t everything, but the math behind retirement saving is compelling. https://www.mrmoneymustache.com/2012/01/13/the-shockingly-si...

Soon to have 25% skimmed off every year and that's assuming you get to live long enough to spend it.

Re: Why Don't Tech Companies Pay Their Engineers to Stay?

#213
post #172

It's always puzzled me why many tech companies seem so reluctant to give counter-offers to departing employees. Trying to pay as little as possible and not easily giving raises, even to their most productive employees, is at least somewhat understandable. But if a valuable employee is about to leave, possibly taking some critical knowledge with them, you'd think that a 50% raise should be on the table out of pure sel…

I think a lot of your points play a role, but a major one is that when the employee is handing in his resignation, it's likely they have mentally already closed that chapter in their life and won't remain happy or productive. At best they leave soon anyway, at worst you're now paying a premium for worse work.

For the company that might still be a worthwhile trade-off. Gives the company time to train up replacements and avoids an immediate cliff-edge.

Re: Why Don't Tech Companies Pay Their Engineers to Stay?

#214

Hiring people is like gambling for companies, as in most tech companies hire some person on the off chance they're a 10x developer, though expect them to be a 1.5x one on average. Even if you're a 2x developer, you haven't lived up to the hypothetical 10x ideal to your employer, so they aren't willing to put in the extra money and effort to convince you to stay, there's more incentive to put that money into hiring th…

I don’t understand, from the beginning, why we weren’t talking about the 10x manager mathematically improving their team in aggregate? That has sports coach metaphors whereas the 10x engineer only has 19th century patent metaphors.

Re: Why Don't Tech Companies Pay Their Engineers to Stay?

#215
post #130
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What prevents engineering firms from acting like law firms?

In theory, this would become some type of exploitable game theory. Send out offer letters to companies most indispensable people, just to jack up your competitors labor costs. Arms race. Eventual mutually assured destruction.

The fraudulent offer letters notwithstanding, I think insiders would see this as an opportunity for Moneyball rather than a risk of unraveling in confusion.

Moneyball as in an optimization technique when roles are static. Obviously this is generic because static data of any value inevitably ends up in a spreadsheet. Otherwise, I’m not sure game theory holds together here.

Re: Why Don't Tech Companies Pay Their Engineers to Stay?

#216
post #161

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://www.levels.fyi/ . I don't know how accurate their data is, though.

I mean experience wise, not TC. Like “how do my skills compare to a Google L7?”

Search LinkedIn for senior staff engineers at google

Re: Why Don't Tech Companies Pay Their Engineers to Stay?

#217

As a regular reader of Rachelbythebay - I agree with the sentiment of a lot of other posters here, it's not the money that makes people quit. A classic story here is the "Sodas are no longer free" one: https://steveblank.com/2009/12/21/the-elves-leave-middle-ear... The total cost of free sodas for engineers is probably small compared to their salaries, and for the individual engineer, the new $0.50 per soda cost is p…

Holy carp! When they took away the free soda at KFC I started updating my resume. I worked at the KFC headquarters for over 10 years and for most of that time they had free soda in the lobby. Then the cafeteria management got turned over to a 3rd party, I'm guessing as a way to save money. Setting aside a food company not managing their corporate cafeteria, this 3rd party wanted to sell sodas and that's really hard w…

If corporate starts sharpening their pencils at the small things they will sure cut on the bigger things like bonuses and raises. Time to leave if you are an over-performer looking for merit rewards.

Re: Why Don't Tech Companies Pay Their Engineers to Stay?

#219
post #210

Earlier quoted context omitted.

" Here’s hoping you’re lucky enough to live until then. "? The median lifespan is over 80 and developers are paid above the median, often by quite a bit. It's far, far more likely in your 50s that you'll be staring down the barrel of a layoff + industry downturn and cursing yourself for the money spent on your trip across Europe and other frivolities in your 30s.

The median lifespan is no longer over 80, at least not for middle age males in the US, though it is for females: https://www.ssa.gov/oact/STATS/table4c6.html It also depends a lot on what your current age is. If you're 60 or older it's 80 or more. If you're younger than that and male it's under 80, going down the younger you are. Covid and other things reduced life expectancy in the US. This is the 2021 table, the mo…

There are some uh, relevant socioeconomic correlations here.

Re: Why Don't Tech Companies Pay Their Engineers to Stay?

#220

As a regular reader of Rachelbythebay - I agree with the sentiment of a lot of other posters here, it's not the money that makes people quit. A classic story here is the "Sodas are no longer free" one: https://steveblank.com/2009/12/21/the-elves-leave-middle-ear... The total cost of free sodas for engineers is probably small compared to their salaries, and for the individual engineer, the new $0.50 per soda cost is p…

Holy carp! When they took away the free soda at KFC I started updating my resume. I worked at the KFC headquarters for over 10 years and for most of that time they had free soda in the lobby. Then the cafeteria management got turned over to a 3rd party, I'm guessing as a way to save money. Setting aside a food company not managing their corporate cafeteria, this 3rd party wanted to sell sodas and that's really hard w…

Oh dear. I agree with your point, but man, I do not handle free soda at work well.

I do comfort drinking way too much.

Post reply on HN