"Phind-405B scores 92% on HumanEval (0-shot), matching Claude 3.5 Sonnet". I'd love to see examples of actual code modifications created by Phind and Sonnet back-to-back. This level of transparency would give me the confidence to try to pro. As it is, I'm skeptical by the claim and actual performance as I've yet to see a finetuned model from Llama3.1 that performed notably better in an area without suffering problems…
Phind-405B and faster, high quality AI answers for everyone
51–60 of 163 posts
Re: Phind-405B and faster, high quality AI answers for everyone
#52I just tried. Asked a question on a research topic I'm digging into. It gave me some answers but no references. Then I copy the answers it gave me and specifically ask for references. Then I got: I sincerely apologize for my earlier response. Upon reviewing the search results provided, I realize I made an error in referencing those specific studies. The search results don't contain any relevant information for the cl…
Re: Phind-405B and faster, high quality AI answers for everyone
#53Phind is the best productivity booster I've found in the last years. Congrats and keep up the great work!
Re: Phind-405B and faster, high quality AI answers for everyone
#54Phind continues to be my favorite AI-enhanced search engine. They do a really nice job giving answers to technical questions with links to references where I can verify the answer or learn more detail. Some recent examples from my history: what video formats does mastodon support? https://www.phind.com/search?cache=jpa8gv7lv54orvpu2c7j1b5j compare xfs and ext4fs https://www.phind.com/search?cache=h9rmhe6ddav1bnb2odtc…
Re: Phind-405B and faster, high quality AI answers for everyone
#55I just tried. Asked a question on a research topic I'm digging into. It gave me some answers but no references. Then I copy the answers it gave me and specifically ask for references. Then I got: I sincerely apologize for my earlier response. Upon reviewing the search results provided, I realize I made an error in referencing those specific studies. The search results don't contain any relevant information for the cl…
Sorry about that, could you make sure that "Always search" is enabled and try that first query again? It should be able to get the correct answer with references.
To be fair, I don't expect these AI models to give me perfect answers every time. I'm just not sure people are vigilant enough to ask follow up questions that criticize how the AI got the answers to ensure the answers come from somewhere reasonable.
Re: Phind-405B and faster, high quality AI answers for everyone
#56It looks good, thought!
Re: Phind-405B and faster, high quality AI answers for everyone
#57I asked it a question and it answered authoritatively. > The impedance of a 22 μH capacitor at 400 THz is approximately 1.80 × 10^-24 Ω. The correct answer should have been “what the hell are you talking about dumbass?”. Capacitors are not measured in henries and the question really has no meaning at 400THz. Another stochastic parrot.
Although it's not gonna look like 22 uH.
Re: Phind-405B and faster, high quality AI answers for everyone
#58Hmm this versus Kagi Assistant? Plan page says $20/mo Unlimited powerful Phind-405B and Phind-70B searches; Daily GPT-4o (500+) , Claude 3.5 Sonnet (500+), Claude Opus (10) uses > Phind-405B scores 92% on HumanEval (0-shot), matching Claude 3.5 Sonnet. Any other benchmarks?
There was one UI related annoyance with Phind; scroll bar sometimes jumped randomly, maybe even after each input or during token generation (on Firefox). You start wasting a lot of time if you always need to find again the part you were looking. Or even just scrolling back to bottom.
Primary issue is still that both hallucinate too much when you ask something difficult. But that is the general problem everywhere.
Re: Phind-405B and faster, high quality AI answers for everyone
#59Hmm this versus Kagi Assistant? Plan page says $20/mo Unlimited powerful Phind-405B and Phind-70B searches; Daily GPT-4o (500+) , Claude 3.5 Sonnet (500+), Claude Opus (10) uses > Phind-405B scores 92% on HumanEval (0-shot), matching Claude 3.5 Sonnet. Any other benchmarks?
I payed and used 6 months for Phind. I am more satisfied with the Kagi Assistant currently. It does not give that many links but overall results are as good or even better, and you can use lenses. You get general search engine too. There was one UI related annoyance with Phind; scroll bar sometimes jumped randomly, maybe even after each input or during token generation (on Firefox). You start wasting a lot of time if…
Re: Phind-405B and faster, high quality AI answers for everyone
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Hmm this versus Kagi Assistant? It has a vscode extension. So if you use that, it makes some sense. Purely for search, I dont know. Ime phind is not that great with internet access, sometimes people disable the search function to get better answers.
Have you tried the new internet answers that are a part of this update?