291–300 of 803 posts
I guess the "mountain" is the key. "Safe" alone is far from being a product. As for the current LLM, Id even question how valuable "safe" can be.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are two possibilities. 1. Either you are correct and the neural networks humans have are exactly the same or very similar to the programs in the LLMs. Then it will be relatively easy to verify this - just scale one LLN to the human brain neuron count and supposedly it will acquire consciousness and start rapidly learning and creating on its own without prompts. 2. Or what we call neural networks in the computer…
I agree with your stance - that being said there aren’t two options, one being identical or radically different. It’s not even a gradient between two choices, because there are several dimensions involved and nobody even knows what Superintelligence is anyways. If you wanted to reduce it down, I would say there are two possibilities: 1. Our understanding of Neurel Nets is currently sufficient to recreate intelligence…
“…a straight shot to safe superintelligence and in particular to spend a couple of years doing R&D on our product before bringing it to market," Gross said in an interview.” A couple years ??
Earlier quoted context omitted.
If public ownership means we give one guy a button to end the world, I'm not sure how's that's a meaningful difference.
The fact that the world hasn't ended and no nuke has been launched since the 1940s shows that the system is working. Give the button to a random billionaire and half of us will be dead by next week to improve profit margins.
I don't understand how "safe" AI can raise that much money. If anything, they will have to spend double the time on red-teaming before releasing anything commercially. "Unsafe" AI seems much more profitable.
enterprises, corps, banks, governments will want to buy "safe" AI, to push liability for mistakes on someone who proclaimed them "safe".
“…a straight shot to safe superintelligence and in particular to spend a couple of years doing R&D on our product before bringing it to market," Gross said in an interview.” A couple years ??
Same funding as OpenAI when they started, but SSI explicitly declared their intention not to release a single product until superintelligence is reached. Closest thing we have to a Manhattan Project in the modern era?
> superintelligence is reached i read the article but I am not sure how they know when this condition will be true. Is this obvious to ppl reading this article? is it emperor has no clothes type situation ?
Anyone know John Carmack's status on his AGI company?