Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks for your comment. I'm at a loss as to how to respond. I'm show casing my startup that is a referral marketing app. Of course, the demo that I set up for it will be about referral marketing too, no?
Don't worry about it, a lot of techies are just grumpy about the very idea of marketing, because they think the world would be a better, purer place without it. They're obviously wrong. Carry on!
Show HN: Promotioner - Allow your readers to pay with clicks
21–26 of 26 posts
Re: Show HN: Promotioner - Allow your readers to pay with clicks
#22Re: Show HN: Promotioner - Allow your readers to pay with clicks
#23Re: Show HN: Promotioner - Allow your readers to pay with clicks
#24Looks like an interesting idea, but I'd be extremely wary of signing up for any site that rewards users for helping boost your SEO with inbound links. Google has traditionally been pretty harsh on anything resembling linkbuying, and these incentives seem to blur that line. That said, I think there's a lot of room for improved, dead simple referral systems, and I'm glad to see another one enter the fray.
Thanks Michael. The long term idea is to bring the idea of referral marketing to blogs and CMS systems. ALL of the top 500 ecommerce websites have their own referral or affiliate programs. None of the top blogs have their own referral program. And thats because there was no dead simple way of referring blogs yet. We plan to change that. Launching with reward-for-clicks as our MVP. Will introduce pay-per-sale referral…
Re: Show HN: Promotioner - Allow your readers to pay with clicks
#25very similar to successnexus - but, they have a very good blog going as well.
We're the same guys actually. Promotioner is owned by SuccessNexus :) Promotioner is a lean rebranding effort to focus more on the site-wide referral idea, and less on the all-in-one ecommerce + mailing list + referral program tool.
It would help focus people on quality over quantity.
Re: Show HN: Promotioner - Allow your readers to pay with clicks
#26(And yes, for folks who don't want to show their email address in the URL due to spam worries, they can replace their email address with a unique username.) I would make this the default. Exposing addresses like that is begging for your users to be spearfished.
Thanks. Creating a username requires people to signup. Signing up = friction. And makes fewer people promote you. Allowing people to refer any URL without signing up, simply by adding their email id at the end of the URL seems to be working better in increasing web traffic. Its a trade off. But its a decision taken because the pay off is worth it (till now. If a lot of users say otherwise, then will switch it).