ReFiddle: Fiddle for Regexp testing
31–40 of 43 posts
Re: ReFiddle: Fiddle for Regexp testing
#32I'll go ahead and recommend RegexBuddy ( http://www.regexbuddy.com/ ) as another useful tool for testing regexes. (No affiliation, this just happens to be one of the most useful programs I've bought with my own money.)
One of the few Windows apps I miss. Fantastic software.
Re: ReFiddle: Fiddle for Regexp testing
#33I use sublime text for this. Considering how many regexes I write a day, I actually need a text editor that has this support. Don't you ? :)
No. Regexes are a hack. I don't write them every day, I write them when I need a hack to get around a problem there isn't a good solution for.
Re: ReFiddle: Fiddle for Regexp testing
#34I use sublime text for this. Considering how many regexes I write a day, I actually need a text editor that has this support. Don't you ? :)
No. Regexes are a hack. I don't write them every day, I write them when I need a hack to get around a problem there isn't a good solution for.
They are a legitimate solution for efficient text matching problems.
Re: ReFiddle: Fiddle for Regexp testing
#35Re: ReFiddle: Fiddle for Regexp testing
#36I'll go ahead and recommend RegexBuddy ( http://www.regexbuddy.com/ ) as another useful tool for testing regexes. (No affiliation, this just happens to be one of the most useful programs I've bought with my own money.)
Re: ReFiddle: Fiddle for Regexp testing
#37Re: ReFiddle: Fiddle for Regexp testing
#38And it supports sharing & a cookbook too.
Re: ReFiddle: Fiddle for Regexp testing
#39Would be great if there were support for more Regex types. All those supported by grep (ie. BRE, PRE, PCRE) seem fairly essential – and being a Python guy, Python would be nice too (which are PCRE-ish). Nice work, though.