Live data from Hacker News

OrbStack: The fast, light, and easy way to run Docker containers and Linux

orbstack.dev

41–50 of 161 posts

Re: OrbStack: The fast, light, and easy way to run Docker containers and Linux

#43

I switched to Orbstack about 2 weeks ago after having read about it here on HN. I develop a cloud native system entirely writen in Rust. All my own containers are build without Docker thanks to rules oci in Bazel. However, for integration testing, I'm using internal tools that fire up, say a database container and run the tests all from within Bazel to leverage test caching and parallelization. For a while, i was str…

I'm in a similar position but I need to make sure I run distro kernel (because that's part of integration) instead of whatever OrbStack shipped.

In the end I just run a Linux VM and run everything inside. Zero issues by definition.

I'd actually love to use OrbStack Machines cause it feels much nicer than UTM, but, well, I can't run OrbStack's patched Linux kernel :(

Re: OrbStack: The fast, light, and easy way to run Docker containers and Linux

#44
post #4

Nice to see this here :) I work on OrbStack. Happy to answer questions!

Hi, is it possible to add a virtual machine mode to OrbStack? See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41423667 for why. I'm okay with most (or all) nice integrations unavailable.

Basically I want a true UTM replacement, the one I can run my own kernel.

Re: OrbStack: The fast, light, and easy way to run Docker containers and Linux

#46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Asked the other way around, why would anyone think a Docker container runner would be tied to MacOS?

Because Windows users are unlikely to care about Docker and Linux people don’t pay for stuff

This is hilarious and perfectly sums up my experience with Mac developers. Half of them have no idea Docker Desktop actually installs a Linux VM. They think how amazing their incredibly expensive system is, yet it's mostly a glorified text editor. The WSL experience on Windows convinced me buying a MacOS machine makes no sense.

Re: OrbStack: The fast, light, and easy way to run Docker containers and Linux

#48

I switched to Orbstack about 2 weeks ago after having read about it here on HN. I develop a cloud native system entirely writen in Rust. All my own containers are build without Docker thanks to rules oci in Bazel. However, for integration testing, I'm using internal tools that fire up, say a database container and run the tests all from within Bazel to leverage test caching and parallelization. For a while, i was str…

I did the same thing. Docker Desktop for Macos kept going into resource saving mode and then not responding to anything after some time, so I tried Orbstack after seeing it here.

Re: OrbStack: The fast, light, and easy way to run Docker containers and Linux

#49

OrbStack is by far some of the best software I've encountered on Mac, but unfortunately I have difficulty convincing my employer to pay for a commercial license, and with my sparse Docker usage, I'm confined to using it only for personal/hobby usage. What's amazing is it fixes an (almost) show stopper bug when using libuv (or software that uses it like CMake) with Rosetta 2 [1], with the bug present on all Docker/VMs…

Sorry to be blunt but your employer must be real penny pinchers, it’s not that expensive, and it’s a tool that would help you get the job done.

Re: OrbStack: The fast, light, and easy way to run Docker containers and Linux

#50

I love how there is absolutely no mention that it is mac-only (or even what versions of mac are supported), even on the download page.

It's in the page title.

Conveniently left out of the HN link, and mentioned nowhere in the page body.
Post reply on HN