Earlier quoted context omitted.
And you think censorship will solve this? You’ll just get a different sort of monster. One that probably appeals to your worldview in the short term because you fit the typical person you think will be controlling it forever and you think the scope will somehow to be constrained to a small group of things you don’t like. Well intentioned, but extremely naive. Something our society will sadly have to relearn every cen…
> And you think censorship will solve this? A media company being punished isn't censorship , media companies aren't above the law.
Text from the 1st amendment: "or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press"
You see that part that says "The press"? Thats what a media company is.
Yes, if the government punishes "The press" for its speech, and threatens it with legal action, that is by definition something that effects free speech and is censorship.
Definitionally, I cannot think of something that could be more accurately be described as censorship.