Earlier quoted context omitted.
72% of Brazilians do not agree with the banning of X: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9UleMSw8m3o
That’s a random sampling with a tiny group of people. You might as well do an internet poll on a very directed channel.
Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky
411–420 of 855 posts
Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky
#412Earlier quoted context omitted.
Something tells me at the least bsky will not begin a name calling primary school attack with a supreme court justice of a sovereign nation while using abusive names for the president of that country all the while using childish fake AI generated graphics. PS. Somehow all of this feels very natural when done by Musk. It kind of makes sense. It feels like “yes yes, he’d do this”.
A supreme court judge clearly acting against the laws of their state, but somehow Musk is the bad guy.
Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky
#413Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky
#414Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're a libertarian, but you have issues with someone holding their own political opinions. Interesting combination.
I have a problem with someone imposing their political opinions on others by buying the means of publishing and communication. You don’t?
That sounds a lot like copium to justify an authoritarian action by the state because it benefits you personally.
Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky
#415Earlier quoted context omitted.
Mastodon was dead from the start, it isn’t in the running. Threads has too big of an image problem to overcome. No one wants Instagram for Twitter. Bluesky is the only platform currently that has a chance, but it’s an under funded, tiny team who can’t ship on time. Bluesky will see a surge in registrations but no change in DAU as they still haven’t supported video, so no one will stay on the site.
> No one wants Instagram for Twitter It has about 200M MAU. So a lot of people clearly do want it.
Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky
#416Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is it acceptable for foreign owned entities to not follow the rules of a country? I think, probably not - the choice is to follow the regulations or to not be there, like Meta in China.
Alexandre de Moraes whims are now considered the "rules of the country", how quickly Brazil turned into a dictatorship.
Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky
#417[flagged]
If anything it seems like Musk seems to be attacking the sovereignty of a nation because he agrees with anything far right these days.
Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky
#418I left Xitter about 6 weeks ago and went all in on Bluesky. Took time to give feedback to the algo, but it's doing much better these days. I don't feel like I'm missing out on much, you'll get the same news & events on Bluesky. A lot of people who were scared of losing their following are reporting more, better engagement with lower follower counts. What I really like about it is the ATProto, which while imperfect, s…
Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky
#419I'm from Brazil and this judge is totally out of control. I agree that X needs to have a legal representative in Brazil, this is correct anywhere, but he threatened a fine of 200k and imprisonment to the person Musk appointed as representative if his stricture orders were not complied with. He threatened us to pay $9k in fines per day if we use VPN to access X. Unless you are part of the government base, it is diffic…
Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky
#420Earlier quoted context omitted.
> he legitimately believes that “the woke mind virus” is an existential threat to our society Sure. I don't think he's a hypocrite. He has , however, hyper fixated on a topic that's in vogue in tech circles but totally irrelevant elsewhere. Unlike in technology, where one can credibly fail upwards, doing that in politics comes at the cost of influence. And in this block order we're seeing, tangibly, the consequences…
I do agree that he is hyper fixated on specific things like gender but – I do think that there are elements of the “woke mind virus” that are okay with censorship. I don’t think that censorship has any place in a democracy, and I do think it is a problem we need to address. The executive branch asked Twitter to ban a NY Post story on the grounds that it was misinformation when it wasn’t. It was “malinformation”: http…
The Twitter/X experiment seems to have primarily succeeded in demonstrating that nobody has good solutions for this problem, and just repeating words like “misinformation” and “free speech” doesn’t get us any closer to a solution.
Props to Bluesky for trying something else, at least.