ReFiddle: Fiddle for Regexp testing
refiddle.com
ReFiddle: Fiddle for Regexp testing
1–10 of 43 posts
Re: ReFiddle: Fiddle for Regexp testing
#2Awesome! I'm however unable to make negative lookaheads and lookbehinds work right now – though Ruby & .NET are said to support them according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_regular_expressio....
Re: ReFiddle: Fiddle for Regexp testing
#3Rex V (http://www.rexv.org/) is my current favourite regex playground.
Re: ReFiddle: Fiddle for Regexp testing
#4Would be great if there were support for more Regex types. All those supported by grep (ie. BRE, PRE, PCRE) seem fairly essential – and being a Python guy, Python would be nice too (which are PCRE-ish).
Nice work, though.
Re: ReFiddle: Fiddle for Regexp testing
#5For a CLI debugger/play-through have a look at Regexp::Debugger (I posted this video link yesterday - http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4136179)
Re: ReFiddle: Fiddle for Regexp testing
#6More contrast, please. I can barely see the green matches on my screen.
Re: ReFiddle: Fiddle for Regexp testing
#7Nice work! :)
http://rubular.com is also a good one (Ruby regexes).
Re: ReFiddle: Fiddle for Regexp testing
#8Would be great if there were support for more Regex types. All those supported by grep (ie. BRE, PRE, PCRE) seem fairly essential – and being a Python guy, Python would be nice too (which are PCRE-ish). Nice work, though.
[deleted]
Re: ReFiddle: Fiddle for Regexp testing
#9I'll go ahead and recommend RegexBuddy (http://www.regexbuddy.com/) as another useful tool for testing regexes. (No affiliation, this just happens to be one of the most useful programs I've bought with my own money.)
Re: ReFiddle: Fiddle for Regexp testing
#10http://www.regexpal.com/ is a good alternative too