Alexander Grothendieck
theguardian.com
Alexander Grothendieck
1–10 of 57 posts
Re: Alexander Grothendieck
#2Re: Alexander Grothendieck
#3Re: Alexander Grothendieck
#4Suppose he were both. Then do we need to distinguish between them? If so, would it be possible to make that distinction? If not, can we afford to need to make it? This applies to all incomprehensibly gifted persons.
Re: Alexander Grothendieck
#5I shall choose to remember him in his prime.
Re: Alexander Grothendieck
#6Re: Alexander Grothendieck
#7Re: Alexander Grothendieck
#8Nothing forgotten about him. His work is foundational to modern algebraic geometry and there’s no mathematician who doesn’t know who he is.
Re: Alexander Grothendieck
#9Never heard of him before, RIP but this reads like the beginning of neal stephenson novel… interesting
Re: Alexander Grothendieck
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
57
sorry, that's not a prime because 3*19
"Although fifty-seven is not prime, it is jokingly known as the Grothendieck prime after a legend according to which the mathematician Alexander Grothendieck supposedly gave it as an example of a particular prime number." [1]
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/57_(number)#In_mathematics