Live data from Hacker News

Brazilian court orders suspension of X

theguardian.com

281–290 of 388 posts

Re: Brazilian court orders suspension of X

#281

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wow. The VPN piece of this ought to be the nut graf. Wild overreach.

And banning a social media platform that millions use is not?

X has refused to abide by the governments decisions, so that is big but understandable news. Trying to casually ban all VPNs as part of that is surprising and excessive.

Re: Brazilian court orders suspension of X

#282
post #202

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In this case was X not explicitly asked to remove the illegal content? They could have simply complied with the local law and avoided this outcome. With their hardcore engineers I’m sure they could have come up with a region-locked solution.

They already have regional blocking, they have been blocking political tweets and accounts in Turkey upon the request of the Turkish government since years now.

What is unclear to me from reading articles is whether they are demanding region blocking (which may not be reasonable but at least makes sense) or a global deletion of that content...

Re: Brazilian court orders suspension of X

#283

> The decision imposes a daily fine of R$50,000 (£6,800) on individuals and companies that attempt to continue using X via VPN. Fining even users is a bit surprising.

> Fining even users is a bit surprising Not really. Using VPN is illegal in China. The police can put you in jail for using VPNs. Of course, there are very few cases like this even though many people use underground VPNs. This is typical behavior of an authoritarian state: the government reserves the rights to punish you when the situation is right.

VPNs are not illegal in China. About a third of people in China use VPNs and the govt is fine with VPNs unless you're using it to break the law.

Re: Brazilian court orders suspension of X

#284

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That won't stop you from being fined $9k USD!

I wonder, is there a realistic chance the govt can somewhat easily detect what you have side loaded? ( short of opening your phone and browsing instslled apps )

Not remotely without a cooperating app or app store. But they could detect VPN traffic for most VPNs and tie that to your sim card which is tied to your ID.

Re: Brazilian court orders suspension of X

#285
post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Try saying "cisgender" on Twitter, of course the guy is moderating speech he personally doesn't like. It's not difficult to observe.

So Elon Musk getting community-noted is him moderating speech he doesn't like?

You assume that's speech he doesn't like.

Re: Brazilian court orders suspension of X

#286

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wow. The VPN piece of this ought to be the nut graf. Wild overreach.

And banning a social media platform that millions use is not?

Banning a site is one thing.

Banning an entire communications technology, with abusively high fines for citizens who defy the ban, is on a whole other level.

Re: Brazilian court orders suspension of X

#287
post #217
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is it normal that a judge can impose such blanket fines on users?

This guy is the head of the STF, the highest court in Brazil, so he's kinda doing an "I am the law" bit here. That said, I do think that judges in Brazil can have a larger investigative role due to the different legal system that does not happen in other countries with more separation of powers to prevent exactly this sort of thing.

That's not the case. The law as it applies, is thoroughly explained here.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39966382

Re: Brazilian court orders suspension of X

#288

Earlier quoted context omitted.

All Elon needs to do is have a legal representative in Brazil for his commercial venture. He chose this.

Because the Supreme Court arbitrarily threatened the legal representatives, and Elon didn't comply. There is no legal process whatsoever, nor the regular mediums have been used. It's all arbitrary without the due process. Even a legalist would need to concede that the law hasn't been followed in the first place.

As you said - Moraes didn't threaten. Moraes executed.

The prior legal representative of X had all her personal bank accounts frozen.

Re: Brazilian court orders suspension of X

#289

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because the Supreme Court arbitrarily threatened the legal representatives, and Elon didn't comply. There is no legal process whatsoever, nor the regular mediums have been used. It's all arbitrary without the due process. Even a legalist would need to concede that the law hasn't been followed in the first place.

> There is no legal process whatsoever, nor the regular mediums have been used That's simply false. The proper legal processes are being followed. It's just a narrative pushed by those who refuse to accept that their actions are/were illegal and have consequences.

A thorough explanation of the applicable law, point by point, that demonstrates that what you are saying is complete fantasy:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39966382

Re: Brazilian court orders suspension of X

#290

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I did NOT violate the law. How come he is deleting the VPN apps on my phone??? That I need to remote to my overseas job??? How come I I'm now banned from reading what Zelensky, Kasparov, Yann LeCun, and thousands of others world leaders have to say? How come my neighbor, who makes a honest living through X-Twitter, has now lost her job?

They can't and won't delete any apps from your phone, but the apps would be gone from the stores, which does not make it much less of a bullshit. Restricting access to X makes sense: the platform has removed themselves from the country, making it impossible to resolve legal and financial disputes in Brazil, so it makes sense they are not allowed to operate in the country anymore. Then again, punishing users that acce…

Even if the goal of the brazilian judge makes sense, that doesn't make the judge's actions legal. In a country of laws, the end does not justify the means.

A thorough explanation of the applicable law, point by point, that demonstrates that everything that is happening here is outrageous :

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39966382

Post reply on HN