Live data from Hacker News

MongoDB takes a swing at PostgreSQL after claiming wins against rival

theregister.com

11–20 of 55 posts

Re: MongoDB takes a swing at PostgreSQL after claiming wins against rival

#11

I had such a bad experience with Mongo DB back in 2012-2013 that I don't think I'll ever use it again, or even really consider it. But maybe it's changed and gotten better since then? Anyway. I just use Postgres.

> Anyway. I just use Postgres.

Same. Because I care about my data.

Re: MongoDB takes a swing at PostgreSQL after claiming wins against rival

#12
Granted I really don't spend my time evaluating databases rigorously, but I find claims that MongoDB is more performant than Postgres really difficult to believe. It sounds like a skill issue to me. MongoDB is technical debt, it has it's place for when you don't know what you're doing and you just need to throw your data somewhere. Eventually you're going to grow to a point where the overhead of not using real data structures is going to cease to be worth it. (I realize this is directly contrary to what's stated in the article, but who are you gonna believe, MongoDB or a random HN commenter? :)

Re: MongoDB takes a swing at PostgreSQL after claiming wins against rival

#16

I had such a bad experience with Mongo DB back in 2012-2013 that I don't think I'll ever use it again, or even really consider it. But maybe it's changed and gotten better since then? Anyway. I just use Postgres.

If you like the document db idea there are a lot of choices, especially

https://arangodb.com/

which I think gets little attention because people who use it see it as a secret weapon. Too bad about the license though. Also

https://couchdb.apache.org/

and

https://developer.marklogic.com/

Re: MongoDB takes a swing at PostgreSQL after claiming wins against rival

#17
post #13

The quotes from the CEO are misleading, implying MongoDB is document-based and PostgreSQL is 100% relational. This is not true, PostgreSQL has had JSON support for quite some time.

json/jsonb, hstore, ltree, btree/gin/gist, enum types, nested record types... the list goes on and on. PG is _very_ hard to beat.

Mongodb certainly isn't doing it.

Their entire value proposition boils down to

    create table docs (
      doc jsonb
    );

Re: MongoDB takes a swing at PostgreSQL after claiming wins against rival

#18
post #9

I was there in 2010s migrating Mongo databases chosen by "expert consultants" to Postgres and dealing with the fallout of massive tech debt those decisions usually caused. Won't get fooled again - no matter how many fluff articles they write you will sooner find me rotting in this barren earth than see me pick MongoDB for a new project.

Just checking you said migrating mongo to postgres. Did you mean the other way around? I still don't understand how mongo is still in business.

Re: MongoDB takes a swing at PostgreSQL after claiming wins against rival

#19
Using a gambling company as an example for a win in the IT space sounds to me as if UPS was bragging about winning a contract with a drug cartel to import fentanyl and crystal meth.

Weird choice. Doesn't give you much faith they have a lot of examples of companies migrating from Postgres.

Re: MongoDB takes a swing at PostgreSQL after claiming wins against rival

#20

I had such a bad experience with Mongo DB back in 2012-2013 that I don't think I'll ever use it again, or even really consider it. But maybe it's changed and gotten better since then? Anyway. I just use Postgres.

If you like the document db idea there are a lot of choices, especially https://arangodb.com/ which I think gets little attention because people who use it see it as a secret weapon. Too bad about the license though. Also https://couchdb.apache.org/ and https://developer.marklogic.com/

Isn't PostgreSQL supporting JSON and queries over them? [1]

[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/django/comments/14f68rz/postgresql_...

Post reply on HN