Live data from Hacker News

Brazilian court orders suspension of X

theguardian.com

81–90 of 388 posts

Re: Brazilian court orders suspension of X

#81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Defying court orders can get you arrested in any country even if you and others deem them to be “too arbitrary”

That was not the point I was making. In any case your point applies to defying the monarch too, which might be more applicable here.

This would be more applicable if Brazil had a monarch after 1889. Calling a judge that you don’t like a king does not make him one.

Re: Brazilian court orders suspension of X

#82

"People who use VPN to access X will be subject to daily fines of US$8,900" Edit: Thanks for this user https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41404325 for posting the court order and bringing this new information: Apple and Google must remove all VPN apps from their stores! Apple and Google must DELETE all VPN apps already installed on users' phones!!! https://apnews.com/article/brazil-musk-x-suspended-de-moraes...

Wow! I had to check with local news, because I couldn't believe it. It checks out, he did impose the fine. (It's R$50k if somebody is as uninformed as I was.)

That is deeply messed up. Wow, that's nearly $9000 USD.

Re: Brazilian court orders suspension of X

#83
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The courts threatened to arrest his legal representation if he didn't comply with their demands to take down accounts accused of spreading misinformation and hate speech. So Elon closed all offices in Brasil. You think he should risk having an employee thrown in jail?

Defying a court order can get you arrested in any country.

I'm sure that if Xwitter dispatched a "legal representative" to North Korea who has full moderation powers and will agree to be subjected to anything that a North Korean court orders, even an unblocking of it in NK could be negotiated. Does that mean that it is Musk's fault that his site remains blocked in that country, too? Conversely, is it actually normal for countries to personally punish legal representatives for actions that their employer performed, even if they did not have the power to prevent those actions?

Re: Brazilian court orders suspension of X

#84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In what way? Musk decides what's OK and not OK on twitter. Twitter isn't a platform to promote democracy, it promotes what Musk wants. Twitter has turned into hot garbage. For years my feed was pretty clean as it's almost exclusively tech. Gave it up recently as it was clogged with right-wing conspiracy, odd videos and random made up AI young women randomly following me occasionally.

That's ridiculous. You think Elon Musk goes around reading people's tweets and deciding what he wants or not? Or trained an AI model to only allow content that suits him? The guy literally gets community-noted every once in a while. It's free speech.

Try saying "cisgender" on Twitter, of course the guy is moderating speech he personally doesn't like. It's not difficult to observe.

Re: Brazilian court orders suspension of X

#85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The courts threatened to arrest his legal representation if he didn't comply with their demands to take down accounts accused of spreading misinformation and hate speech. So Elon closed all offices in Brasil. You think he should risk having an employee thrown in jail?

It feels fairly arbitrary from the outside because they complied with similarly gross takedown demands in Turkey and India; https://www.businessinsider.com/free-speech-censorship-elon-... https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/apr/05/twitter-accuse...

The missing context here is that the "misinformation accounts" that X was supposed to remove here are spreading the right wing propaganda saying the election was stolen from far-right sweetheart Jair Bolsonaro. On the other hand, the requests in India and Turkey are coming from, you guessed it, far right sweetheart Modi and Erdogan governments.

If you think Elon is doing this to defend "freedom of speech" I have a beautiful bridge to sell you.

Re: Brazilian court orders suspension of X

#87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes - there is a law that you need to have legal representation in Brazil and Musk is just flouting the law. So shutdown it is for Musk

That came after the judge's order to block the accounts. That is a secondary issue, not the primary one. On that topic, can you speak to the judge's orders to freeze the bank accounts of X's legal representative, even after she had resigned? What's the deal there?

Musk is happy to comply with blocking anything and anyone when it suits him: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41404534

Re: Brazilian court orders suspension of X

#88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The orders of the brazilian court are just too arbitrary, and not just in this case. At some point it ceases to be a judicial court and becomes more of an Emperor's court where the Emperor is making laws as he is going on.

Defying court orders can get you arrested in any country even if you and others deem them to be “too arbitrary”

Yes, and? Doesn't mean that anyone who could avoid it should feel compelled to accept that when this is done by an arbitrary and corrupt government.

Also I'm not sure it's very common for courts to arrest lawyers (and basically use them as hostages) because of their clients actions in most countries.

Re: Brazilian court orders suspension of X

#89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

All Elon needs to do is have a legal representative in Brazil for his commercial venture. He chose this.

I don't really understand the pro-authoritarian stance.

People hate Musk so much that they would rejoice at the Devil doing him harm.

"The enemy of my enemy is my friend" is a widespread fallacy. Attitudes like that gave us alliance with Stalin once, and subsequent 40 years of a Cold War.

Re: Brazilian court orders suspension of X

#90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What's the structural link between X and Starlink?

Both are owned by Musk. I know that is too simple, but that is relatively common in Brazil (to easily link companies because they share owners or shareholders)

It's not common at all.

Musk is shareholder of Starlink, but there are many others. This is kind of thing is only used in cause of fraud like a person who puts other company in name of a third party to avoid fines.

It also shows foreign investors that investing in Brazil is unsafe.

Post reply on HN