Earlier quoted context omitted.
You know, I don't believe most of the urban legends about McDonalds, and there are things they do that I can even respect (for instance, their contribution to french fry science [really], or their [very, very, very, very] gradual adoption of humane farming guidelines.) But make no mistake that McDonalds is a business that is, if not as harmful as Philip Morris, gradable on the same scale. For the most part it's a com…
Can't we say the same things about just about any business? > "but there's a difference between an occasional indulgence" Indeed... > "and the business model that depends utterly on persuading the most persuadable people to harm themselves, for no other reason that they were persuadable" You've lost me. You compare McDonald's to Philip Morris - even though one produces a highly addictive substance and the other produ…
Frito Lay is possibly even more morally fraught than McDonalds, since a large part of their business involves marketing themselves into kids lunches.
I'm not sure where Campbells comes into this. It's not great soup, but it's soup.
Obviously, there are people who think there's nothing wrong with a particularly successful marketing campaign for an unhealthful product. There are plenty of people who think there's nothing immoral about selling cigarettes.
I don't think less of those people, but I strongly disagree with them.