Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Signal already supports groups up to 1000 people iirc, Which is where the practicality fails. This is why Telegram is the only app that works in large protests, unlike Signal. Time and again, Telegram proves that the lack of E2EE actually becomes its strength, as proven by the protestors in Myanmar, Hong Kong, Iran and more countries: https://x.com/Pinboard/status/1474096410383421452 I'm not really against E2EE, bu…
> Matrix could be better but it leaks tons of data Unless you use your server or a trusted one. > has been hacked multiple times in the past too Any links? Looks like it was long ago.
Thoughts on the Durov Arrest
221–228 of 228 posts
Re: Thoughts on the Durov Arrest
#222Earlier quoted context omitted.
I found it interesting to read that their approach is supposedly to split encryption keys across jurisdictions. It sounds like they believe that they should therefore not be able to be compelled to reveal any plaintext because the keys are not in the jurisdiction asking for data, but as far as I can tell this is obviously rubbish, because a computer is not subject to the law, an individual is, and in this case an ind…
> that there aren't really technical blockers to E2E encryption anymore There are several disadvantages, and Telegram would lose its key features: 1. Cloud Sync 2. Instant Multi-device login 3. The ability to create large group chats, like thousands or hundreds of thousands of people in a single place. 4. Sending files up to 4GB.
Cloud Sync of what? WhatsApp doesn't seem any less "cloud synced" than Telegram to me.
> 2. Instant Multi-device login
What does that mean?
> 3. The ability to create large group chats, like thousands or hundreds of thousands of people in a single place.
MLS scales very well to such large groups: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9420/
> 4. Sending files up to 4GB.
How so? WhatsApp, Signal, iMessage and others all support sending files. File size isn't a factor (assuming you're fine with leaking the metadata of who has received the same file).
Re: Thoughts on the Durov Arrest
#223Re: Thoughts on the Durov Arrest
#224Re: Thoughts on the Durov Arrest
#225Re: Thoughts on the Durov Arrest
#226Re: Thoughts on the Durov Arrest
#227Earlier quoted context omitted.
If Ukrainian drone teams and others are using it to publish their footage, in what sense is it not being used by the Ukrainian military?
In the sense that it's not used for military communications.
Ukrainian military bloggers use it, their public persons use it and while there is probably an an order that dictates not to use it - I really doubt it is being followed completely considering the vast majority of Ukrainian military are yesterdays conscripts and not professional soldiers. Some of them drink, some of them sell their equipment, some of them gamble.
I really doubt they don't use telegram. Maybe it is not systemic but neither this is for Russia.
Re: Thoughts on the Durov Arrest
#228Earlier quoted context omitted.
In the sense that it's not used for military communications.
I seriously doubt you will be able to prove it. Ukrainian military bloggers use it, their public persons use it and while there is probably an an order that dictates not to use it - I really doubt it is being followed completely considering the vast majority of Ukrainian military are yesterdays conscripts and not professional soldiers. Some of them drink, some of them sell their equipment, some of them gamble. I real…
Nobody who's got a secret to keep would use it.