70b runs on 4x CS-3 estimated at $2-3m each, let’s say total system cost $10m, drawing ~100kW power. They don’t mention batch size, so let’s start with batch size 1 and see where we get. At 100% utilisation for 3 years that’d be 42 billion tokens for a cost of $10m capital plus ~$0.5m power and cooling let’s say, or $250 per million tokens. They’re claiming they can sell their API access at $0.60/million. To break ev…
Cerebras Inference: AI at Instant Speed
51–60 of 75 posts
Re: Cerebras Inference: AI at Instant Speed
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's totally nuts. How do they deal with the silicon warping around disabled cores or dark silicon? How long of hard running does it take before the chip gets fatally damaged and needs to be replaced in their system? Word on the street is that h100s fail surprisingly often, this can't be better
Is this all mostly a heat spreader efficiency requirement?
Re: Cerebras Inference: AI at Instant Speed
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's totally nuts. How do they deal with the silicon warping around disabled cores or dark silicon? How long of hard running does it take before the chip gets fatally damaged and needs to be replaced in their system? Word on the street is that h100s fail surprisingly often, this can't be better
edit: I should have just checked their website instead of guessing. Apparently WSE has significant fabrication challenges, which makes what Cerebras has accomplished all the more impressive. But it is still surprising that no one else has attempted this in the HPC field. I had guessed that Cerebras had made some trade-offs in process in order to make it work at scale, but then they aren't actually building these devi…
Re: Cerebras Inference: AI at Instant Speed
#54It’s insanely fast. Here’s an AI voice assistant I built that uses it: https://cerebras.vercel.app
Re: Cerebras Inference: AI at Instant Speed
#55It would be understandable that they are focused currently on inference speed, but features like structured output and prompt caching make it possible to build more capable LLM applications. Does Cerebras support reliable structured output like the recent OpenAI 4o?
They are running stock Llama 3.x. If the underlying models support structured output, so will they. For example, I know the latest batch of Mistral models all have json output support.
Re: Cerebras Inference: AI at Instant Speed
#56Re: Cerebras Inference: AI at Instant Speed
#57Can really fast inference (e.g. 1M tok/sec) make LLMs more intelligent? I am imagining you could run multiple agents and can choose and discard outputs using other LLMs simultaneously. Will the output look more like a real thought process? Or will it remain just same?
Re: Cerebras Inference: AI at Instant Speed
#58Re: Cerebras Inference: AI at Instant Speed
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
edit: I should have just checked their website instead of guessing. Apparently WSE has significant fabrication challenges, which makes what Cerebras has accomplished all the more impressive. But it is still surprising that no one else has attempted this in the HPC field. I had guessed that Cerebras had made some trade-offs in process in order to make it work at scale, but then they aren't actually building these devi…
It shouldn't be surprising. It's hard as fuck, and we don't know if it's worth it yet (there's something to be said for "if your compute dies you send your remote hands to swap out a high four figure component" and not "decommission a high-six-figure node"
And actually there have been attempts to do it, I mentioned in an earlier version of my comment that Gene Amdahl had attemped to make WSE work something like 20 years ago, without success - but also without the clear profitability story of AI to attract the same mountains of cash being thrown around today.
What's surprising is not that it is hard, or that it's hard as fuck, but that given the potentially stratospheric rewards for success there have not been more attempts in this direction.