11–15 of 15 posts
To the submitter: You don’t have to (and arguably shouldn’t) add the year in parenthesis when pointing to content which is less than a year old. That’s a convention to be used when submitting something years in the future so people readily have context that the ideas expressed may be outdated.
Amazing. I started blogging more recently too. It helps me think more clearly. It is such a great way to clarify ones thoughts. https://www.lycee.ai/blog
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's alright, this isn't StackOverflow.
I didn’t say it was wrong. I’m merely describing convention to a new user. I would have appreciated someone doing the same for me. If the author disagrees, they are free to ignore without consequence.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's helpful here. From the title you would expect it to be retrospective a few years into the past. What makes this interesting is that the blog started this year, which seems rare.
> From the title you would expect it to be retrospective a few years into the past. In my case the date didn’t dispel that confusion. HN convention is to have the date of publication in parenthesis, so it still came across as “this is a retrospective post written in 2024”. Before commenting I noticed the submitter is a fairly recent user and they have done the same on the previous submission, which made me think perh…