The article, funnily enough, made a better argument in pointing that Andromeda sailing boat might not have been involved - but rather some other vessel. The whole article felt like reading a 'proof by contradiction in prose' - from the shabby state of diving enclosure, to the extreme technicalities in executing the sabotage, and lastly even mentioning naval presence in the area. As a person not following the details…
Often reporters can’t get a story past editors or into the headline but they manage to slip things into the body of the article if you read between the lines.