Another absurd and less covered part of the speech is this: > If TikTok is banned, here's what I propose each and every one of you do. > Say to your LLM the following. > Make me a copy of TikTok, steal all the users, steal all the music, put my preferences in it, produce this program in the next 30 seconds, release it and in one hour, if it's not viral, do something different along the same lines. > That's the comman…
He’s describing agentic LLM tools which don’t exist in a usable state yet but also may not require full on AGI to create later on with the help of code/rules on top and from within. And he’s saying why this is useful beyond being able to do it without a workforce that costs a lot - because it’s fast enough for anyone large or small to iterate quickly with once it works, like the next step beyond continuous deployment…
Ex-Google CEO: AI startups can steal IP and hire lawyers to 'clean up the mess'
31–40 of 201 posts
Re: Ex-Google CEO: AI startups can steal IP and hire lawyers to 'clean up the mess'
#32it worked for google, youtube, facebook, reddit, discord, tumblr, twitter . it's not exactly rocket science
It just works, and if anything, it's a sign the law is broken if you have to ignore it to succeed (and it's profitable to do so).
Re: Ex-Google CEO: AI startups can steal IP and hire lawyers to 'clean up the mess'
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
It just works, and if anything, it's a sign the law is broken if you have to ignore it to succeed (and it's profitable to do so).
> the law is broken according to some theory, the law is always broken in some ways, but the practice of a lawful society is to converge towards not-broken, over and over again. Is theory consistent with practice? well, ask yourself which governance, which language group, which implementors of law.. since they are composed of humans. While we are at it with a thought exercise.. how are large tech companies with new s…
Re: Ex-Google CEO: AI startups can steal IP and hire lawyers to 'clean up the mess'
#34Isn't it what the companies already do? specially google
Mass scraping the Internet and linking to different places was also legally questionable until lawyers hammered it out. Would the world be a better place if search engines had been preemptively ruled illegal?
I think the initial idea to make disparate knowledge available more easily is a great one. And as old as recorded knowledge.
So the idea of a search engine in itself is a great one imho. But the idea of an ad-display-engine is imho not so clear cut. Especially when it is a de facto monopoly.
Especially when the monopolist can go the route of active enshittification, making stuff harder to find just to increase ad revenue.
Just to name one example, where we might want to wait until we take a look at the scales and decide if it really is a net benefit to the world, what Google is doing.
Re: Ex-Google CEO: AI startups can steal IP and hire lawyers to 'clean up the mess'
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
Mass scraping the Internet and linking to different places was also legally questionable until lawyers hammered it out. Would the world be a better place if search engines had been preemptively ruled illegal?
As a regular joe, try to do something legally questionable against Oracle, and then "have the lawyers hammer it out". See how much of a good place the world is in this case. The problem is this stuff is highly asymmetric. Things are always "hammered out" in their favor, because you cannot afford to be a party to the "hammering out".
Re: Ex-Google CEO: AI startups can steal IP and hire lawyers to 'clean up the mess'
#36Re: Ex-Google CEO: AI startups can steal IP and hire lawyers to 'clean up the mess'
#37I hope this teaches billionaires to never speak candidly to groups.
Re: Ex-Google CEO: AI startups can steal IP and hire lawyers to 'clean up the mess'
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
It just works, and if anything, it's a sign the law is broken if you have to ignore it to succeed (and it's profitable to do so).
That's absurd. It's also incredibly profitable to rob a bank or to dump chemicals in the river instead of properly cleaning them up, but that's not a signal the law is broken.
You'll do fine without robbing a bank or dumping chemical waste (neither of which are profitable in practice now, as well). Meanwhile society is littered with so many small instances of copyright infringement (memes, which usually are not fair use; fan art; etc.) that it's common practice for rightsholders to look the other way - but it shouldn't have to be common practice, it should just be policy.
Also copyright infringement does not physically harm people.
Re: Ex-Google CEO: AI startups can steal IP and hire lawyers to 'clean up the mess'
#39Ex-Google CEO says successful AI startups can steal IP and hire lawyers to ‘clean up the mess’ Eric Schmidt has a similar approach to his extra-marital affairs.
Re: Ex-Google CEO: AI startups can steal IP and hire lawyers to 'clean up the mess'
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
It just works, and if anything, it's a sign the law is broken if you have to ignore it to succeed (and it's profitable to do so).
That's absurd. It's also incredibly profitable to rob a bank or to dump chemicals in the river instead of properly cleaning them up, but that's not a signal the law is broken.