Live data from Hacker News

How I won $2,750 using JavaScript, AI, and a can of WD-40

davekiss.com

31–40 of 229 posts

Re: How I won $2,750 using JavaScript, AI, and a can of WD-40

#31
post #4

[flagged]

Odd. I didn't find it tedious at all

I was getting bored toward the middle, but that is because it is a topic that didn't interest me specifically, NOT because the writing was bad.

I found the parts I was interested to be wonderful.

Re: How I won $2,750 using JavaScript, AI, and a can of WD-40

#32

Lubricating a sliding door Quieting a squeaky door hinge Lubricating an HVAC register lever Wd-40 is not really a lubricant. You can use WD-40 to clean gunk out of things, but you really need to follow it up with a proper lubricating oil

I learned a lot about WD-40 from this project! This is a highly debated topic, but their website leans into the fact that WD-40 is, indeed, a lubricant. > While the “W-D” in WD-40 stands for Water Displacement, WD-40 Multi-Use Product is a unique, special blend of lubricants. The product’s formulation also contains anti-corrosion agents and ingredients for penetration, water displacement and soil removal. Regardless…

It is a lubricant, just not a very good one for most uses. It can't bear much load and it tends to just dissappear in a short time.

I once replaced a series of mortice lever locks in a first house that were very worn after a decade of use. You had to shake the key to get them to open. I was amazed on opening them to find them completely dry, when they come greased. I suggested they lubricate the replacements occasionally. They replied that they sprayed them regularly with wd40. This has washed the grease out and left... virtually nothing.

Re: How I won $2,750 using JavaScript, AI, and a can of WD-40

#33
post #5
post #3

[flagged]

It just got to the front page of HN, which includes a large percentage of users who buy and use WD-40 [1]. That alone might be worth the price of admission. You could also think about this as a collab between WD-40 and Javascript, which is pretty funny. The author is presumably posting this video and blog everywhere, which only further amplifies WD-40's outreach. And they themselves now have a positive brand associat…

> I'm actually shocked the author had to go and buy a can of it.

Some fancy people are on the Ballistol team, I'll have you know!

Re: How I won $2,750 using JavaScript, AI, and a can of WD-40

#36
post #10

This is an excellent example of using LLMs to convert knowledge into productivity and profit. This will be the way forward: https://www.lycee.ai/blog/large-language-models-productivity...

That's not the way forward, that's how LLMs are already being used for short term gains. The way forward cannot possibly be having to participate in an even less predictable gig economy than the gig economy. That's the way backwards.

Re: How I won $2,750 using JavaScript, AI, and a can of WD-40

#38

Lubricating a sliding door Quieting a squeaky door hinge Lubricating an HVAC register lever Wd-40 is not really a lubricant. You can use WD-40 to clean gunk out of things, but you really need to follow it up with a proper lubricating oil

> Wd-40 is not really a lubricant

And yet, it lubricates! I've heard your claim a lot, but the fact remains, it makes machinery work more smoothly, by reducing friction, and it is effective over significant time periods. By any definition, it is a lubricant.

https://www.wd40.com/myths-legends-fun-facts/

> Myth: WD-40 Multi-Use Product is not really a lubricant.

> Fact: While the “W-D” in WD-40 stands for Water Displacement, WD-40 Multi-Use Product is a unique, special blend of lubricants. The product’s formulation also contains anti-corrosion agents and ingredients for penetration, water displacement and soil removal.

Re: How I won $2,750 using JavaScript, AI, and a can of WD-40

#40
post #4

[flagged]

"Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something." - https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

I know it feels like you're 'just' sharing an opinion (or, lord help us, a 'fact'), but if you consider the externalities—i.e. the effect on the culture when many people post this way—the expected value of posts like this is super negative for everybody—including yourself—since over time it makes the commons nasty and lame. That's why we try to avoid them here.

Post reply on HN