Live data from Hacker News

An open-source flow battery kit

dualpower.supply

51–60 of 111 posts

Re: An open-source flow battery kit

#51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The amount of electrolyte doesn't scale the available power though, only the available energy.

Energy storage is the problem that needs a solution, e.g., storage from summer to winter.

Seasonal energy storage is the last thing that needs to be addressed in the storage hierarchy. There are very high-value targets starting on very low time frames.

Re: An open-source flow battery kit

#52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are two key details you are missing: 1) Its scalable to dishwasher size, ( enough to power a tiny house ) 2) If you shot it with a bullet, it would just leak salt water. That is all. Lithium Ion will explode: Now here is the quiz: If you have a cell phone that is inflating, do you A) Dunk it in water? or B) Toss it in a full document safe? or c) Quickly empty your document safe, and toss it in? If a flow batter…

… if you are looking to scale this to a couple of hundred megawatts, just stop reading and thinking about this now I thought that was one huge appeal of flow batteries is that you can basically infinitely scale them. China has a 100MW installation (potentially more since this 2022 report) https://www.pv-magazine.com/2022/09/29/china-connects-worlds...

"But that's not what happened. Instead of the batteries becoming the next great American success story, the warehouse is now shuttered and empty. All the employees who worked there were laid off. And more than 5,200 miles away, a Chinese company is hard at work making the batteries in Dalian, China.

The Chinese company didn't steal this technology. It was given to them — by the U.S. Department of Energy. First in 2017, as part of a sublicense, and later, in 2021, as part of a license transfer."

https://www.npr.org/2022/08/03/1114964240/new-battery-techno...

Re: An open-source flow battery kit

#53
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The author actually talks about ESS in a comment to the linked blog post from the article. Apparently their battery generates a ton of H_2 that needs to be managed. That could easily be the sort of thing that only is possible/realistic at large scales, thus eliminating sizing the battery down indirectly. https://chemisting.com/2024/03/15/an-open-source-diy-flow-ba...

you can just vent h2 to the atmosphere

Your local fire department will want to very closely inspect your explosive materials handling and safety procedures. Think about what big banks of lead-acid batteries have to do, and google the pictures of battery rooms with their roof blown to bits.

Re: An open-source flow battery kit

#54
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Also, the internal resistance depends entirely on how many cells you have. Right, from the one study I can find, commercial flow batteries have about 10-20x the internal resistance of a lithium ion battery, so the match the power and energy capabilities of a single li-ion cell you would need a liter of electrolyte and about 30 (!) cells (3 for voltage x 10 for power). And that is for a commercial quality flow batter…

A flow battery isn't going to burst into extremely high temperature flames in a self-sustaining not easily extinguishable fire that also spews toxic fumes in mass quantities. I'll take a basement (or garage) with a flow battery over lithium ion ANY day of the week if I want battery backup for my house.

You would not use a laptop-style lithium battery for battery backup for your home. You would use LFP. It does not have the burst-into-flame problem you are thinking of.

At some point I expect we will look back at the era when we used really flammable electrolytes and laugh about how wild that was. I bet we are not that far from it being just a memory.

Re: An open-source flow battery kit

#55
post #7

I cannot see how this is useful outside of being a fun student learning program. From the data it appears a battery with 1L of electrolyte provides about 18Wh of energy. Mind you this is at ~1.2V, which isn't especially useful without a boost converter. With a boost converter though you would need a low internal impedance from the battery, which I highly doubt is any good with a paper membrane (from what I understand…

Not a battery expert, but this seems the right ballpark for useful batteries. Back of envelope stuff: 1liter for 18Wh. 1k liter 18KWh (this is an average hot tub). 10k litre for 180Kwh. This is a ~$1000 farming tank. ~100KWh lithium batteries are around the $20-30k. (Used Tesla pack for reference) Quick google shows flow electrolyte in the neighbourhood of $100 per KWh. Or $10k for a ~100KWh battery. All this is noth…

> ~100KWh lithium batteries are around the $20-30k. (Used Tesla pack for reference)

Nitpick: that seems high, and probably very specific to high capacity Model S packs. A brand new 75kWh Tesla pack for a Model 3 is around $10K installed these days.

Re: An open-source flow battery kit

#56
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

These guys in the US make a 500kwh version, that can run at 75kw of discharge power across 3 phases, and its a single shipping container: https://essinc.com/energy-warehouse/ It doesn't seem like it would take up that much space to have 200 shipping containers sitting somewhere, i'm pretty sure the Home Depot distrubution center in our town already is close to that in their parking lot (yes, you would want them not o…

That’s incredible. I wonder what are the costs relative to a grid scale battery of equivalent size. I only wish they made one that were barrel sized and fit for consumers. Worst case, you have a leak vs a home battery fire.

> Worst case, you have a leak vs a home battery fire.

Battery fires are an EV (and then, only certain models) and laptop/phone thing. Only a few home batteries use the really flammable electrolytes (mostly Tesla Powerwalls, I'd bet). Most people are using LFP for home, which is less expensive and doesn't have the fire problem.

Re: An open-source flow battery kit

#57
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

you can just vent h2 to the atmosphere

Your local fire department will want to very closely inspect your explosive materials handling and safety procedures. Think about what big banks of lead-acid batteries have to do, and google the pictures of battery rooms with their roof blown to bits.

i'm familiar with the destructive power and unpredictable nature of hydrogen detonations, yes ;)

but that's what happens when you don't vent the hydrogen to the atmosphere

Re: An open-source flow battery kit

#58
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's in the blog. The author mentions finding that matte inkjet paper worked fairly well. There are much cheaper membranes; ESS for example uses a membrane that is used by lithium ion batteries (I think) and thus is commonly available and very inexpensive.

where in the blog?

> where in the blog?

the blog is listed in the first paragraph of the linked article: https://chemisting.com/2024/03/15/an-open-source-diy-flow-ba...

Re: An open-source flow battery kit

#59
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

where in the blog?

> where in the blog? the blog is listed in the first paragraph of the linked article: https://chemisting.com/2024/03/15/an-open-source-diy-flow-ba...

if by 'the blog' you (or you and kennyblanken) mean https://chemisting.com/, which post do you mean? the post you link to in that blog doesn't say anything about coulombic efficiency or inkjet paper, and there are four years of posts in the blog

Re: An open-source flow battery kit

#60
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Your local fire department will want to very closely inspect your explosive materials handling and safety procedures. Think about what big banks of lead-acid batteries have to do, and google the pictures of battery rooms with their roof blown to bits.

i'm familiar with the destructive power and unpredictable nature of hydrogen detonations, yes ;) but that's what happens when you don't vent the hydrogen to the atmosphere

Yes, but improperly venting the hydrogen is "not venting hydrogen" but looks like venting the hydrogen unless closely inspected.
Post reply on HN