41–50 of 164 posts
It’s “unexpected” because their early training didn’t get rid of it as well as they hoped. LLM’s are good at detecting patterns and like to continue the pattern. They’re starting with autocomplete for voice and training it to do something else. For now, it’s fairly harmless since it’s only a blooper in a lab, but there will likely be open-weights versions of this sort of thing eventually. And there will probably be p…
It’s “unexpected” because their early training didn’t get rid of it as well as they hoped. LLM’s are good at detecting patterns and like to continue the pattern. They’re starting with autocomplete for voice and training it to do something else. For now, it’s fairly harmless since it’s only a blooper in a lab, but there will likely be open-weights versions of this sort of thing eventually. And there will probably be p…
Can someone pleasee convince why i shouldn't be absolutely shit out of my mind cynical about this innovation? we are literally seeing the downfall of trust in society. and no, i dont believe i am exaggerating
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Those are not contradictions.
One of the common bad takes is that since personal things can be distilled to “just math” they are no longer personal or valuable in the sort of way we value personal things. Increasing our understanding of how the world works shouldn’t devalue the world. To put it another way, people having souls is not the only reason to treat people like people. Or as Dr Seuss says: A person’s a person no matter how small.
There were people with your face or voice before, you just didn't care. AI continues a trend: the internet has always been post-scarcity, free copying and offering an amazing array of choices. We are acting as if it's a new thing, but it's been here for 25 years.
It’s “unexpected” because their early training didn’t get rid of it as well as they hoped. LLM’s are good at detecting patterns and like to continue the pattern. They’re starting with autocomplete for voice and training it to do something else. For now, it’s fairly harmless since it’s only a blooper in a lab, but there will likely be open-weights versions of this sort of thing eventually. And there will probably be p…
Can someone pleasee convince why i shouldn't be absolutely shit out of my mind cynical about this innovation? we are literally seeing the downfall of trust in society. and no, i dont believe i am exaggerating
So Open AI has the capability to deep fake any of its users that use the voice chat capability? Yikes.
Did anybody with a passing familiarity with the technology not know this? There's a reason people don't trust their IP to public chat assistants, ya know. It's because they're remorselessly siphoning our data for training purposes. And you've agreed to let them use your inputs for anything they please.
This has always been the Google and FaceBook deal - your data for services, and the AI assistant deal remains the same. I believe people will flock to the best AI with their data, handing it on a silver platter. Will they spend half a second thinking about privacy or prefer immediate results? When you know your competition uses AI, you aim to have just as much AI assistance or more.
Despite it being creepy, this is super cool from a technical standpoint.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can someone pleasee convince why i shouldn't be absolutely shit out of my mind cynical about this innovation? we are literally seeing the downfall of trust in society. and no, i dont believe i am exaggerating
Luckily, the same person bringing this tech to market (Sam Altman) sells the solution to the trust problems his tech will create (WorldCoin).
Similarly, Google doesn't let you use face matching in image search to find every photograph of you on the web, even though they could, and quite similar technology is built into Google Photos.
It’s “unexpected” because their early training didn’t get rid of it as well as they hoped. LLM’s are good at detecting patterns and like to continue the pattern. They’re starting with autocomplete for voice and training it to do something else. For now, it’s fairly harmless since it’s only a blooper in a lab, but there will likely be open-weights versions of this sort of thing eventually. And there will probably be p…
Can someone pleasee convince why i shouldn't be absolutely shit out of my mind cynical about this innovation? we are literally seeing the downfall of trust in society. and no, i dont believe i am exaggerating