11–18 of 18 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
They do (sometimes) but in such a way that almost no one sees them, especially online. If a tree falls in the forest..
If you don't see a tree falling that's on you. https://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/series/correctionsan...
Nobody meaning, 99% of the population that reads news.
This really reads like a badly disguised hit piece against Elon, doesn't it? The guy posted something he thought was real, then deleted it when it turns out it wasn't. Then the writer goes on to mention he "hasn't apologized" and "continues sharing material criticizing the UK government and law enforcement authorities' responses to the riots". Why does he need to apologize? Oh no, he made a mistake - going by that lo…
> This really reads like a badly disguised hit piece against Elon, doesn't it? No. > the Guardian's owners should publicly apologize to all their readers if they get anything wrong What, you mean they should publish corrections and clarifications in an easy to see way: https://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/series/correctionsan... You mean they should be aware of their own history and publish that too: https://www.t…
It's hiding your mistakes because realistically 99% of the population who reads news doesn't care about the corrections.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> This really reads like a badly disguised hit piece against Elon, doesn't it? No. > the Guardian's owners should publicly apologize to all their readers if they get anything wrong What, you mean they should publish corrections and clarifications in an easy to see way: https://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/series/correctionsan... You mean they should be aware of their own history and publish that too: https://www.t…
Putting corrections in a link that nobody realistically sees or cares about is not publicly apologizing. It's hiding your mistakes because realistically 99% of the population who reads news doesn't care about the corrections.
Maybe you can issue some corrections and clarifications. Show us how it's done.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you don't see a tree falling that's on you. https://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/series/correctionsan...
Nobody seeks out corrections and clarifications. Nobody meaning, 99% of the population that reads news.
Is it any wonder such people defend Musk for his ignorance and childish behavior?
How about demonstrating how one should admit being wrong and offer a correction, since that is what you're complaining others don't do properly.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you don't see a tree falling that's on you. https://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/series/correctionsan...
Nobody seeks out corrections and clarifications. Nobody meaning, 99% of the population that reads news.
The Guardian and many other newspapers of record admit their mistakes and publish corrections despite your claim that they do not.
Got it.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nobody seeks out corrections and clarifications. Nobody meaning, 99% of the population that reads news.
To clarify then, The Guardian and many other newspapers of record admit their mistakes and publish corrections despite your claim that they do not. Got it.
Elon has also admitted many mistakes in the past especially around tweets. You can find these easily if you listen to all his podcasts and appearances but again most people don't and the corrections gets far fewer views than the original spicy take.
It's more similar than you want to admit.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
To clarify then, The Guardian and many other newspapers of record admit their mistakes and publish corrections despite your claim that they do not. Got it.
They sometimes do, but they publish it in a place where no one reads it, perhaps by design. They could publish it to the front page, especially if the original article was front-page. Elon has also admitted many mistakes in the past especially around tweets. You can find these easily if you listen to all his podcasts and appearances but again most people don't and the corrections gets far fewer views than the origina…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
They sometimes do, but they publish it in a place where no one reads it, perhaps by design. They could publish it to the front page, especially if the original article was front-page. Elon has also admitted many mistakes in the past especially around tweets. You can find these easily if you listen to all his podcasts and appearances but again most people don't and the corrections gets far fewer views than the origina…
It's called media literacy. If you don't know where publications publish their corrections, then that's on you.